AMIR HUSSAIN S/O ANWAR HUSSAIN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/9834/2025 · 2025-08-05
Ganesh Ram Meena
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 26486 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 26486 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:29940] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Fourth Bail Application No. 9834/2025 Amir Hussain S/o Anwar Hussain, R/o Jaliya First, Tehsil Beawar, District Beawar (Raj.) (At Present In Central Jail, Ajmer). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Savita Nathawat For Respondent(s) : Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Order 05/08/2025
1. The accused-petitioner has filed this fourth bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. arising out of F.I.R. No.225/2024, registered with the Police Station Saket Nagar, District Beawar (Raj.) for offence under Sections 323, 143, 451 & 504 of IPC.
2. Heard.
3. Considered.
4.
Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is of causing injury to one Gopal Singh. Learned counsel further submits that the injured- Gopal Singh has been examined as PW-9 before the learned trial Court and during his examination, he has not supported the prosecution story and has been declared hostile. Learned counsel also submits that the accused-petitioner is in custody for last more than one
[2025:RJ-JP:29940] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-9834/2025] year i.e. from 17.05.2024 and trial of the case is likely to take considerable time to conclude, therefore the accused-petitioner may be enlarged on bail.
5. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the submissions made by learned counsel for the accused-petitioner.
6. Having considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the accused-petitioner and more particularly the fact that the injured witness- Gopal Singh, who has been examined as PW-9 before the learned trial Court, has not supported the prosecution story and has been declared hostile, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.
7. This fourth bail application is, accordingly, allowed and it is
directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court or any other Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /8