Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 26486 (KAR)

SRI. PRABHU J, v. SMT. G PAVITHRA,

CRL.P/7286/2023 · 2025-01-06

S R Krishna Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:13 CRL.P No. 7286 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 7286 OF 2023 (482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS) BETWEEN: SRI. PRABHU J, S/O MR R JAYAPAL, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, R/A NO 60, III MAIN ROAD, SWATHANTHRAPALAYA, SRIRAMPURAM, BANGALORE 560 021. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. MATHEW P M.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. G PAVITHRA, D/O G GOPAL AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, 2. MASTER PRATHIK P AGED ABOUT 7 YEARS S/O PRABHU J 1 & 2 R/AT NO 22, 2ND CROSS, 2ND MAIN ROAD, NAGENDRA GARDEN, SRIRAMPURA, BENGALURU 560 021. …RESPONDENTS THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE PETITIONER IN CMIS.200/2020 ON THE FILE OF II ADDL. PRINCIPAL JUDGE AT BANGALORE AGAINST THE ABOVE PETITIONER. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: Digitally signed by LEELAVATHI S R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:13 CRL.P No. 7286 of 2023 CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR ORAL ORDER In this petition, erstwhile husband of respondent No.1 and erstwhile wife are seeking quashing of the entire proceedings filed by respondent No.1 against the petitioner in Crime Miscellaneous No.200/2020 on the file of the II Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Bengaluru. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the material on record. 3. Though several contentions have been urged by the petitioner in support of his claim that the aforesaid petition filed by the respondent against him is not maintainable, having regard to the fact that the petitioner has already entered appearance in the aforesaid Criminal Miscellaneous No.200/2020 and has filed statement of objections and said proceedings are pending since 2020 and no interim order is passed in the present petition, - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:13 CRL.P No. 7286 of 2023 without expressing any opinion on the merits and claim of the petitioner, I deem it just and appropriate to dispose of the petition reserving liberty in favour of the petitioner to urge all contentions in the aforesaid proceedings before the trial Court, who shall adjudicate upon the matter after providing sufficient and reasonable opportunity to both the parties and in accordance with law. 4. Subject to the aforesaid liberty and leaving open all contentions, petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE MDS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5