[2025:RJ-JP:34403] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12918/2025 1. Vinod Kumar Sharma Son Of Late Shri Sanwar Mal Sharma, Aged About 65 Years, Resident Of D-43, Krishna Vihar, Near Dunac Motors, Jaisalmer Road (Nh-15), Bikaner (Raj.) 2. Smt. Kiran Gupta Wife Of Shri Ajay Gupta, Aged About 58 Years, Resident Of 152, Vidyut Nagar-B, Queens Road, Jaipur (Raj.) 3. Arvind Kumar Yadav Son Of Shri Mohan Lal Yadav, Aged About 55 Years, Resident Of 2/275, Vidhyadhar Nagar, Jaipur (Raj.) 4. Smt. Sunita Sharma Wife Of Shri Narendra Sharma, Aged About 46 Years, Resident Of 65, Vidyut Nagar-A, Ajmer Road, Jaipur (Raj.) 5. Anoop Modi Son Of Late Shri Om Prakash Modi, Aged About 52 Years, Resident Of 24, Tagore Path, Ram Nagar, Sodala, Jaipur (Raj.) 6. Mohd. Iqram Qureshi Son Of Shri Mohd. Yakub Qureshi, Aged About 62 Years, Resident Of 279, Sanjay Nagar-B, Kalwar Road, Jhotwara, Jaipur (Raj.)-302012 7. Reena Meena Daughter Of Shri Devi Sahai Meena, Aged About 40 Years, Resident Of C-1-512, Vasistha Path, Chitrakoot, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Pr. Secretary To Government, Urban Development Housing Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.) 2. Jaipur Development Authority, J.l.n. Marg, Jaipur Through Its Commissioner. 3. Dy. Commissioner (Prithvi Raj Nagar Zone), Jaipur Development Authority, Jaipur ----Respondents [2025:RJ-JP:34403] (2 of 3) [CW-12918/2025] For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ajay Gupta For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 28/08/2025 Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners has filed representation dated 27.05.2024 (Annexure- 18), however, the same is not considered by the concerned authorities which amounts to violation and non compliance of the dictum passed in Pawan Meena vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. reported in (SBCWP No. 1665/2024; Neutral Citation: 2024:RJ-JP:5792) and Chief Secretary circular dated 19.02.2024. Heard. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, this Court directs respondent No.2- Commissioner JDA to give audience to the petitioners on 11.09.2025 at 03:00 PM and to consider the representation, and thereafter pass a speaking order in accordance with law, within a period of 30 days, as per the facts of the case. Additionally, it is directed that in light of Chief Secretary circular and dictum of this Court, if any representation is filed, the same should be decided in appropriate manner. It is made clear that petitioners are at liberty to take appropriate recourse, in accordance with law if grievance of the petitioners remains unredressed, as per result of the representation. [2025:RJ-JP:34403] (3 of 3) [CW-12918/2025] Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of with the aforementioned directions. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed. (SAMEER JAIN),J DEEPAK/7