APHC010374212025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] THURSDAY,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 21021 OF 2025 Between: 1.TEJA CONSTRUCTIONS, ENGINEERING CONTRACTORS REP. BY AUTHORISED SIGNATORY OFFICE AT PLOT NO.321, HMT SATHAVAIANA NAGAR, KUKATPALLY, HYDERABAD-500072 . ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE UNION OF INDIA, REP BY GENERAL MANAGER, DEN/NORTH/SOUTH CENTRAL RAILWAY, RAIL NILAYAM, SECUNDERABAD-500071 EMAIL GM@SCR.RAILNET.GOV.IN 2.THE DIVISIONAL RAILWAY MANAGER, GUNTUR DIVISION, SOUTH CENTRAL RAILWAY, VIKAS BHAVAN, PATTABHIPURAM, GUNTUR, ANDHRA PRADESH-522006 EMAIL DRM@SCR.RAILNET.GOV.IN 3.SHRI SUBHASH KUMAR SINGLA, RETD. CHIEF SAFETY OFFICER, W.RLY. RESIDING ARBITRATOR R/O A-1102, MOUNT EVEREST, BHAKTI PARK. NEAR IMAX CINEMA, MUMBAI-400037 EMAIL SKSINGLAIRSE@,GMAIL.COM 4.SHRI RAJIV KUMAR RETD, PCEE/SWR CO-ARBITRATOR R/O HOUSE NO. A, TOWER 6, PURVANCHAL HEIGHTS, GREATER NOIDA EMAIL RAIIVANUBHA@GMAIL.COM 5.SHRI AJAY KUMAR LAI RETD, PFA/SYSTEM, CO-ARBITRATOR R/O DDA, HIG FLATS, BLOCK 3A/101A, MOTIA BCHAN, NEW DELHI- 110055 EMAIL AJAY K LAL@YAHOO.COM . ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.JYOTHI RATNA ANUMOLU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.ALEKHYA TADASINA(CENTRAL GOVT COUNSEL) The Court made the following ORAL ORDER: Heard Ms. Jyothi Ratna Anumolu, Ld. Counsel for the Writ Petitioner and, Ms. K. Tanusha, Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of Ms. T. Alekhya, Ld. Central Government Counsel. 2. Ld. Counsel for the Writ Petitioner submits that as the Counsel appearing for the Respondents has furnished the Proceeding of the Arbitral Tribunal dated 20.08.2025 terminating the Arbitral Proceedings which are also the subject matter in the present Writ Petition. In this view of the matter this Court is of the opinion that the present Writ Petition has become infructous. 3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. No order as to costs. Needless to state that the Writ Petitioner is always at liberty to seek any remedy under law. 4. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. _________________________________ GANNAMANENIRAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 21.08.2025 Mnr 98 HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION No.21021 OF 2025 Dt: 21.08.2025 Mnr