KOSARAJU SRIDHAR BABU v. YADLAPALLI CHINA VENKATESWARA RAO
CRP/1985/2024 · 2025-07-02
T C D Sekhar
Original Suitbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 26482 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 26482 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010375072024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3505] THURSDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1985/2024 Between:
1. KOSARAJU SRIDHAR BABU, S/O.SRI RAMA MURTHY, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, R/O. KOLAKALURU VILLAGE, TENALI MANDAL GUNTUR DISTRICT
...PETITIONER AND
1. YADLAPALLI CHINA VENKATESWARA RAO, , S/o. Dasaradha Ramaiah, aged about 55 years, R/o.Nagaralu,Guntur, Guntur District ..
...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased tobegs to present this this Memorandum of Civil Revision Petition to this Hon'ble Court against the common order passed in I.A.No.354 of 2024 in O.S. No. 71/2014 on the file of the Court of the Principal Civil (Senior Division) JUDGE Tenali, dt 15.07.2024 IA NO: 1 OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to dispense with filing of the certified copy of the common order passed in IA.No.354/2024 in O.S.No.71/2014 on the file of the Court of the Civil Judge (Senior Division) tenali Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. V V L N SARMA Counsel for the Respondent:
1. The Court made the following:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1985 of 2024 ORDER:
No representation for the petitioner.
2. As can be seen from the e-Courts of District Judiciary, the main suit in O.S.No.71 of 2014 on the file of Principal Senior Civil Judge, Tenali, was partly decreed by judgment and decree dated
30.11.2024. In view of the same, the cause in the present Civil Revision Petition does not survive.
3. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed.
_____________________ JUSTICE T.C.D. SEKHAR
Dt: 03.07.2025 sj
181 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D. SEKHAR
CRP No.1985 of 2024
Date 03.07.2025
sj