[2025:RJ-JP:31620] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9806/2025 Ramesh Chand Sharma S/o Laduram, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Mishro Ki Dhani, Geejgarh, P.s. Sikandra District Dausa (Raj.) (Presently Confined In Sub Jail Bandikui). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Poonam Chand Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Tarun Jain Mr. Devi Singh, PP with Mr. Shubham Kumar Sain HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 13/08/2025 1. This instant application for bail filed under Section 483 of BNSS by the applicant-accused Ramesh Chand Sharma S/o Laduram in FIR No.294/2025 dated 23.06.2025 registered at P.S. Sikandra District -Dausa, whereby the applicant-accused was charged under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 189(2), 352, 118 (2) and 109 BNS. 2. The applicant Ramesh Chand Sharma S/o Laduram was arrested on 23.07.2025 and has in judicial custody since then. The Court below has dismissed the bail application. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant relying upon grounds raised in bail application submits that the applicant is innocent and falsely implicated in the present case. Further he submitted that the investigation relating to present [2025:RJ-JP:31620] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-9806/2025] applicant-accused is complete and is no more required by the Investigating Agency for investigation. He further assures that in case, the applicant-accused is required for further investigation, the applicant-accused will be available for such investigation. He also submitted that the investigation/trial will take its own time and no purpose will be served by keeping the applicant-accused in custody. 4. Aforesaid contentions were opposed by learned Public Prosecutor. 5. Heard learned counsel for the applicant-accused and learned counsel for complainant along with learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record by both the parties. 6. Learned counsel for the parties submit that this is a matter of free fight, wherein both the parties have registered criminal cases against each other and now with intervention of astute leaders of village, they have settled their dispute out of Court and the matter pertains to land dispute between them. Learned counsels for the parties further submits that both the injured Jagdish and Banwari are present before this Hon’ble Court. Learned counsel for complainant-injured submits that he has no objection, in case bail is granted. 7. Upon hearing the arguments and perusing the record, we have found that the applicant-accused is no more required in the investigation and he is in custody for quite some time. The further proceedings will take its own time, therefore, looking to entirety of facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, [2025:RJ-JP:31620] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-9806/2025] the Court deems it appropriate to grant bail to the applicant- accused Ramesh Chand Sharma S/o Laduram. 8. Thus, the instant bail application filed on behalf of applicant- accused Ramesh Chand Sharma S/o Laduram, is hereby allowed and the applicant-accused Ramesh Chand Sharma S/o Laduram, is ordered to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of ₹50,000/- with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant-accused shall not tamper with evidence or influence the witness in any manner. (ii) The applicant-accused shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not repeat any criminal offence punishable under the Law. (iii) The applicant-accused shall attend the hearing of the Trial Court on the date fixed by the Trial court or as and when asked to appear before the Trial Court. (iv) In case of any violation of above conditions, the bail granted to the applicant-accused shall be liable to be cancelled. 9. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the Trial Court through E-mail. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J GAURAV /353