1 / 3 2025:CGHC:30726 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2866 of 2025 Pradeep Kumar Jain Chopra S/o. Hansraj Ji Jain Aged About 61 Years (Proprietor - Rajhans Foods), R/o. H.No. 241, Shantipara, Ward No. 07, Sambalpur, Kanker, District - Kanker (C.G.), Firm's Address - 352/3/kh, Sambalpur, North Bastar Kanker, District - Kanker (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - The Union of India Through - Deputy Secretary, Ministry Of Consumer Affairs, Food And Public Distribution Department Of Food And Public Distribution, Krishi Bhawan, New Delhi. 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Department Of Food, Civil Supplies And Consumer Protection, Mahanadi Bhawan Mantralaya, New Raipur, Atal Nagar, District - Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Managing Director Chhattisgarh State Marketing Federation Maryadit, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 4 - C.G. State Civil Supplies Corporation Limited, Kanker, District - Kanker (C.G.) 5 - Collector (Food Department) Kanker, District - Kanker (C.G.) 6 - District Marketing Officer Department Of Food, Civil Supplies And Consumer Protection, Kanker, District - Kanker (C.G.) 7 - Food Corporation Of India (Fci) Regional Office - Mova, Vidhan Sabha Marg, Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) ... Respondents ASHUTOSH MISHRA Digitally signed by ASHUTOSH MISHRA Date: 2025.07.09 11:27:15 +0530 2 / 3 For Petitioner : Mr. Akhtar Hussain, Advocate For Union of India : Mr. Tushar Dhar Diwan, CGC For State/Respondents No.2 & 5 : Mr. Saumitra Kesharwani, PL For Respondents No.3 & 6 : Mr. Shreyansh Mehta, Advocate For Respondent No.7 : Mr. R.S. Patel, Advocate along with Mr. Ashish Sahu, Advocate (Hon’ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma) Order on Board 04/07/2025 1. The instant petition has been filed being aggrieved by the inaction on the part of Respondent No.3 in not issuing NAN D.O. of about 24000 quintals of paddy for KMS 2024-25 being eligible under the government’s scheme in lieu of up-lifting of about 6000 quintals of paddy in KMS 2023-24 by the petitioner and further for proportional paddy of 24000 quintals for KMS 2024-25, Bank Guarantee has also been deposited by the petitioner. 2. At this stage learned counsel for the petitioner would confine his prayer that the respondent authorities may be directed to decide his representation. 3. Learned State counsel submits that they have no objection in deciding the representation of the petitioner, if not already decided. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties. 5. Considering the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner, Respondent authorities are directed to decide the pending 3 / 3 representation of the petitioner within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order, if not already decided. 6. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands disposed of. SD/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) JUDGE ashu