Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 26461 (CAL)

BIJOY KUMAR SINGHA v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR

CRM(R)/53/2025 · 2025-06-16

Suvra Ghosh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

14 16.06.2025 Ct.No.34 b.das Allowed C.R.M. (R) 53 of 2025 In Re : An application for bail under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 filed in connection with Raiganj Woman P.S. Case No. 36 of 2025 dated 10.04.2025 under Sections 69/351(2) of BNS, 2023. And In Re : Bijoy Kumar Singha ... Petitioner. Mr. Ayan Bhattacharjee Mr. Kaushik Chaudhuri ... for the Petitioner. Mr. Atif Ahmed Siddiqui ... for the State. Mr. Arnab Chatterjee Mr. Nirupam Dhali …for the de facto complainant. The petitioner is in custody for about 68 days and prays for bail. Heard learned counsels for the parties. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there was a consensual relationship between the parties for a long time, both the parties being major. Charge sheet has been submitted and charges framed. Learned counsels for the State and de facto complainant oppose the payer. I have perused the material on record. The de facto complainant is a lady aged about 30 years. There appears to be a long standing consensual relationship between the parties. The parties were aware of the consequences of the relationship. Charge sheet has been submitted. Further detention of the petitioner is not required and he may be 2 granted bail subject to stringent conditions to instil confidence in the mind of the de facto complainant. Accordingly, the prayer for bail is allowed. The petitioner Bijoy Kumar Singha be released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only), with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Uttar Dinajpur subject to condition that he shall remain outside the jurisdiction of Karandighi P.S. and shall furnish the address where he shall henceforth reside before the learned trial Court, investigating officer and the Officer in charge of the concerned P.S. under whose jurisdiction he shall presently reside. He shall appear before the learned trial Court on every date of hearing fixed by the learned trial Court and shall not intimidate witnesses or tamper with evidence in any manner whatsoever. In the event the petitioner fails to adhere to any of the conditions as stated above without justifiable cause, the learned trial Court shall be at liberty to cancel his bail in accordance with law without further reference to this Court. The application for bail is thus disposed of. All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent certified website copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Suvra Ghosh, J.)