ROHITASH KUMAR YADAV SON OF KISHORI LAL YADAV v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/12135/2025 · 2025-08-13
Sameer Jain
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 26459 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 26459 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:31489] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12135/2025 Rohitash Kumar Yadav Son Of Kishori Lal Yadav, Aged About 70 Years, Resident Of Village Santhalpur, Tehsil Bansur, District Kotputli- Behror (Rajasthan). ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Chief Secretary, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
3. District Collector, District- Kotputli-Behror (Rajasthan).
4. Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Bansur, District- Kotputli- Behror (Rajasthan).
5. Tehsildar, Tehsil Bansur, District- Kotputli-Behror (Rajasthan).
6. Khairatilal, Son Of Rohitash, Santhalpur, Tehsil Bansur, District Kotputli- Behror (Rajasthan). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Akshay Sharma For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Judgment 13/08/2025
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the instant petition can be disposed in light of the judgment encapsulated in Pawan Meena vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. reported in (SBCWP No. 1665/2024; Neutral Citation: 2024:RJ-JP:5792).
2. Accordingly, respondent No.3 is directed to adjudicate the representation/notice for demand of justice (Annexure-4)
[2025:RJ-JP:31489] (2 of 2) [CW-12135/2025] considering the judgment passed in Pawan Meena (Supra) and circular dated 19.02.2024 passed by Chief Secretary, Rajasthan within a period of 30 days from passing of this order.
3. In light of the aforementioned, the instant petition is
disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
(SAMEER JAIN),J JKP/47