Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 26453 (AP)

NADIPALLI VENKATESWARA RAJU v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/19092/2025 · 2025-08-28

K Sreenivasa Reddy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010373962025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3327] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 19092/2025 Between: Nadipalli Venkateswara Raju ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Ap and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. RAVULA NAGARJUNA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE 2. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING The Court made the following: 2 Order: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following prayer; “….pleased to issue an appropriate Writ Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not releasing the admitted/finalized bills payable to the petitioner towards the completed 14 works of Tribal Welfare educational Institution repairs and maintenance in Rampachodavaram ITDA of ASR District under M-Book Pass Orders i.e., 1. M.Book No.451/B/TW/2018-1 for Rs.2,68,788/-, 2. M.Book No.1352/B/TW/2014 for Rs.2,15,573/-, 3. M.Book No.465/B/TW/2018-19 for Rs.3,35,928/-, 4. M.Book No.576/B/TW/2018-19 for Rs.2,38,146/-, 5. M.Book No.2830/A/TW/2014 for Rs.2,38,658/-, 6. M.Book No.575/B/TW/2018-19 for Rs.2,38,866/-, 7. M.Book No.801/b/2022-23 for Rs.3,23,698/-, 8. M.Book No.573/B/TW/2018-19 for Rs.47,798/-, 9. M.Book No.2845/A/TW/2014 for Rs.2,39,310/-, 10. M.Book No.1361/B/TW/2012 for Rs2,33,627/-, 11.M.Book No.574/B/TW/2018-19 for Rs.2,58,350/-, 12. M.Book No.1363/B/TW/2014 for Rs.3,34,756/-, 13. M.Book No.1375/B/TW/2014 for Rs.3,10,709/- and 14. M.Book No.2849/A/TW/2014 for Rs.1,85,720/-, all together in total Rs.34,69,927/- even after finalizing the bills as illegal arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and also oppose to the settled principles of law and consequently, direct the respondents to forthwith release aforesaid amounts.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition. 3. Permission is accorded. 4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. 3 5. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. _______________________ K. SREENIVASA REDDY, J. Date:29.08.2023 ARB 4 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K. SREENIVASA REDDY Writ Petition No.19092 of 2025 Date:29.08.2023 ARB