IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-17408-2001 (O &M) Date of Decision: 10.07.2025 Rajinder Parsad ......Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana and others ....Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. Raman Sharma, Addl. A.G., Haryana. Mr. Dushyant Rana, Advocate for Mr. A.R. Takkar, Advocate, for respondent No.5. JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral) 1. The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India is seeking setting aside of orders passed by Authorities whereby he was awarded punishment of stoppage of 4 annual increments with permanent effect. 2. The petitioner joined respondent on 08.09.1965 as Constable. He has already retired on attaining the age of superannuation. 3. There is no representation of the petitioner. It appears that with the efflux of time, he has lost his interest in pursuing instant petition. 4. Dismissed for want of prosecution with liberty to the petitioner to move an appropriate application within 3 months from today, if cause survives. 5. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. 10.07.2025 (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) shivani JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking Yes Whether reportable No Shivani Gupta 2025.07.11 10:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document