1 ba.1589.25.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1589 OF 2025 MANILAL ISAMAL PAWARA VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA …. Mr. C. C. Deshpande, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. N. B. Patil, APP for the respondent/State. ... CORAM : SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. DATE : 10th October, 2025. P.C.: 1 Not on board. Mentioned. Taken on board. 2 Mr. Chaitanya Deshpande, learned Advocate for the applicant now criticizes and protests the Court while pointing out an order passed by this Court on 4th October, 2025 in the present application, submitting that this Court is not considering his prayer properly. He pointed out the error in the said order. The Court said that it can be corrected and the words “particularly the charge sheet” can be deleted. 3 When this Court said that this can be corrected and the Court is ready to correct, he started to blame the Court. This practice of Advocate Mr. Deshpande is not proper. Therefore, he is warned not to submit like this before the Court again. 2 ba.1589.25.odt 4 Mr. Deshpande, learned Advocate submitted that he will file an application for speaking to the minutes. [ SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. ] nga