Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 26441 (RAJ)

MAHESH KUMAR S/O RAMESHWAR LAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/11826/2025 · 2025-08-12

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:31312] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11826/2025 1. Mahesh Kumar S/o Rameshwar Lal, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Dalelpura Khetdi Dist. Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan). 2. Alanoor Kalal S/o Manohar Kha, Aged About 60 Years, R/o Ward No. 15 Guhala Teh. Neem Ka Thana Sikar, Raj. 3. Mahendra Singh Barala S/o Jai Narayan Barala, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Purnabas Charanwas Teh Neem Ka Thana, Dist. Sikar Raj. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Transport Commissioner, Parivahan Bhawan, Sahakar Marg, Jaipur, (Rajasthan). 2. The Secretary (R.t.o.), Regional Transport Authority, Jaipur Region, Jaipur. 3. The Secretary (R.t.o.), Regional Transport Authority, Sikar Region, Sikar. 4. District Transport Officer, District Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Raghuraj Singh Rajawat For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jeetendra Takar for Mr. S.S. Naruka, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 12/08/2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has filed a representation/legal notice dated 17.07.2025 (Annexure-A-2) before the competent authority, however, the same is not considered, till date. It is further submitted that the petitioner is aggrieved of the respondents actions, whereby, respondents despite various representation of the petitioners are [2025:RJ-JP:31312] (2 of 2) [CW-11826/2025] not taking any action against the persons who are plying their vehicles in an unauthorized manner on the route Sikar to Neem Ka Thana via Udaipurwati and others joint routes. Further, learned counsel has placed reliance upon S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.10046/2017 titled as Chotu Ram Vs. The State of Rajasthan & Ors. and S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.10185/2023 titled as Bhoop Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. Considering the foregoing facts and circumstances of the case, this Court while relying upon the dictum enunciated in Pawan Meena vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (SBCWP No. 1665/2024; Neutral Citation: 2024:RJ-JP:5792), directs the respondents to adjudicate the representation/legal notice dated 17.07.2025 (Annexure-A-2) filed by the petitioner, in accordance with law and as per the facts in a speaking manner, within the period of one week. Further, respondents are directed that if any representation is filed by the citizen/concerned person qua their grievances, the same shall be adjudicate/answered in reasonable time as per the mandate of Pawan Meena (supra). It is made clear that upon failure in complying with the aforementioned direction, appropriate cost will be imposed upon the concerned competent authority which will be recovered from the salary of concerned competent authority. In view of the above, present petition is disposed of. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J JKP/7