Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 26438 (JHR)

RAJENDRA PRASAD MAHTO v. JHARKHAND BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR

WPC/5279/2018 · 2025-04-24

Rajesh Shankar

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:12145-DB IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 5279 of 2018 Rajendra Prasad Mahto aged about 63 years, son of Late Deo Narayan Mahto, Resident of village Kouri Khuthari, P.O. Bhagaiya, P.S. Meharama, District- Godda (Jharkhand) ... ... ... ... ... ... Petitioner Versus 1. Jharkhand Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited, through its Managing Director; Office at: H.E.C. Engineers Bhawan, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District- Ranchi 2. General Manager-cum-Chief Engineer, Jharkhand Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited, Electric Supply Area, Dhanbad; office at: Combined Building, P.O. & P.S. Dhanbad, District- Dhanbad, 3. Electrical Superintending Engineer, Jharkhand Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited, Electric Supply Circle, Chas; P.O. & P.S Chas, District- Bokaro, … … ... Respondents --------- CORAM: HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR --------- For the Petitioner: Mr. Gurupad Singh Munda, Advocate For the Respondents: Mr. Manoj Kumar, Sr.S.C. Mr. Aditya Raman, AC to Sr.S.C. --------- 17/Dated: 24.04.2025 1) Heard the counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the respondents. 2) Admittedly prayers 1 and 2 in the writ petition have since become infructuous. As regards the prayer 3, since the adjudication of the claim of the petitioner work allegedly done for the respondents requires inquiry into certain disputed question of facts, and since the petitioner has effective and alternative remedy of approaching the civil court for recovery of the same, granting liberty to the petitioner to avail the said remedy, the writ petition is disposed of. (M.S. Ramachandra Rao, C.J.) (Rajesh Shankar, J.) Sharda/MM/ Cp.02