VIJAY KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (REVENUE) AND 20 OTHERS
WRIC/6528/2025 · 2025-03-11
Prakash Padia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 26436 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 26436 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:36348 Court No. - 7 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 6528 of 2025 Petitioner :- Vijay Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P Through Its Principal Secretary (Revenue) And 20 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dheerendra Kumar,Karma Singh Yadav,Satya Pal Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
2. In view of the order proposed to be passed herein, no useful purpose would be served by putting the opposite party to notice and keeping this petition pending before this Court. However, in case the opposite party feels aggrieved by the
order his/her right to seek modification/variation of the order is being kept reserved.
3. The basic relief sought by the petitioner in the present petition is to direct the respondent No.2/Additional Commissioner Judicial (First), Varanasi Division Varanasi to decide Appeal No.1641 of 2024 (Vishwanath Vs. Bholanath and others) (Computerized Case No.C32024140000001641) expeditiously.
4. The matter is pending before the Court below since long and considerable time has already been lapsed but till date no final decision has been taken in the matter.
5. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the present petition is disposed of directing the respondent No.2/Additional Commissioner Judicial (First), Varanasi Division Varanasi to decide the aforesaid appeal expeditiously strictly in accordance with law and without granting unnecessary adjournment unless there is no legal impediment.
Order Date :- 12.3.2025 saqlain Digitally signed by :- SYED MOHAMMAD SAQLAIN HAIDER High Court of Judicature at Allahabad