1 2025:CGHC:19894-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR CRMP No. 1778 of 2024 1 - Chandralal Modanwal S/o Ramanand Modanwal Aged About 33 Years. 2 - Ramanand Modanwal, S/o Molai Modanwal Aged About 55 Years. 3 - Kaushalya Devi W/o Ramanand Modanwal, Aged About 52 Years. 4 - Jyoti Prakash Modanlal S/o Ramanand Modanwal, Aged About 30 Years. All are R/o Village Keshavnagar, Police Station Bishrampur, Tahsil And District- Surajpur ( C.G.). ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through- The Station House Officer, Police Station- Bishrampur, Tahsil And District- Surajpur ( C.G.) 2 - Smt. Shalu Modanwal@ Shalu Gupta W/o Chandrapal Modanwal, D/o Omprakash@ Munna, Aged About 30 Years R/o Of Villate- Ahirauli Bazar, District- Kushinagar (U.P.) At Present Residing Of C/o Ravish Gupta@ Pintu Gupta, Son Ishwarlal, Aged About 45 Years, Resident Of Churcha Colliery, P.S. Churcha, District- Mahendragarh- Chirmiri- Bharatpur ( C.G.). ---- Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioners : Mr. Gautam Khetrapal, Advocate. For Respondents/State : Mr. Nitansh Jaiswal, Panel Lawyer. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Mr. Arvind Kumar Verma, Judge Order on Board 2 Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 01.05.2025 1. This petition has been filed under Section 482 of Cr.PC with following relief: “(a) That this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow the petition and further be pleased to quash the impugned First Information Report bearing Crime No.143/2024 registered at Police Station -Bishrampur, District-Surajpur (C.G.) for the offences punishable under Section 498-A, 34 of Indian Penal Code, in the interest of justice.” 2. At the very outset, learned State Counsel submits that in this case charge-sheet/final report has already been filed before the trial Court concerned. He also pointed out that mediation between the parties has failed. 3. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to challenge the charge- sheet/final report before the appropriate forum/Court in accordance with law. 4. In view of above submissions, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to take recourse to the law, if aggrieved with the charge-sheet/final report. 5. Interim relief, if any, granted earlier stands vacated. CC as per rules. Sd/- Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice J.