Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 26434 (GAU)

CHAKRAPANI RAY v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 8 ORS.

WP(C)/7426/2022 · 2025-11-11

N Unni Krishnan Nair

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010234542022 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/7426/2022 CHAKRAPANI RAY S/O LT. G. RAY, R/O VILL. JAKUAPARA PART-1 P.O BONGAIGAON, P.S BONGAIGAON, DIST. BANGAIGAON, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 8 ORS. REP. BY THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM ENVIRONMENT AND FOREST DEPTT. DISPUR GUWAHATI-6 2:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM ENVIRONMENT AND FOREST DEPTT. DISPUR GUWAHATI-6 3:THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS AND HEAD OF FOREST FORCE ASSAM PANJABARI GUWAHATI-6 4:HE CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST (T) ASSAM GUWAHATI KAMRUP (M) ASSAM 5:THE DIVISIONEL FOREST OFFICER NAGAON DIVISION ASSAM 6:THE DEPARTMENTAL PROMOTION COMMITTEE HEADED BY CHIF SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM DISPUR GUWAHATI-6 Page No.# 2/3 7:NEPAL MANDAL FOREST RANGER NOTICE SENT THROUGH RESPONDENT NO. 3 8:RANJAN BARUAH FOREST RANGER NOTICE SENT THROUGH RESPONDENT NO. 3 9:PUSPADHAR BURAGOHAIN FOREST RANGER NOTICE SENT THROUGH RESPONDENT NO. Advocate for the Petitioner : MR J I BARBHUIYA, MR. L MOHAN,MS F BEGUM,MRS. K H CHOUDHURY Advocate for the Respondent : SC, FOREST, MR N RAHMAN (r-7,8,9),MR. A H M R CHOUDHURY (r-7,8,9),MS. R CHOUDHURY (r-7,8,9),MR H R A CHOUDHURY (r-7,8,9) BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR ORDER Date : 12-11-2025 Mr. L. Mohan, learned counsel for the petitioner, on instruction, submits that the relief sought for by the petitioner in the present proceeding has been granted to him by the respondent. Accordingly, he prays that the matter be closed as having been infructuous. The prayer is not objected to by the learned counsel for the State respondent as well as by the learned counsel for the private respondent. In view of the above position, the present writ petition stands closed on having become infructuous. JUDGE Page No.# 3/3 Comparing Assistant