Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010235232025 2025:GAU-AS:17415 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./3520/2025 NAZRUL HOQUE S/O- LATE RAFIQUE UDDIN, R/S- SHABAJPUR, PS- MURAJHAR, P/O- MURJHAR DIST-HOJAI, ASSAM, INDIA,782439 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR S AHMED, MR. K A MAZUMDER Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, MR M HOQUE(INFORMANT),MR. A A R KARIM (INFORMANT) BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS ORDER Date : 16.12.2025 Heard Mr. K.A. Mazumder, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. R.J. Baruah, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State and Mr. A.A.R. Karim, learned counsel for the informant/respondent No. 2. Page No.# 2/3 2. This application has been filed under section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraskha Sanhita, 2023, whereby the accused petitioner namely, Nazrul Hoque, has prayed for bail in connection with Murajar P.S. Case No. 108/2025 under Section 11(2)/109 of BNS, 2023. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that after investigation, the case was charge sheeted followed by framing of charge and presently at the stage of trial. The petitioner has been accused of causing grievous hurt and attempt to murder. He was arrested on 20.06.2025 and presently in judicial custody. In the trial, so far, three witnesses have been examined. 4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State submits on the basis of the TCR that there are sufficient incriminating materials against the petitioner and if granted bail, he may influence the witnesses. 5. The learned counsel for the informant supported the contention of the learned prosecution. 6. It is also pointed by the prosecution and the learned counsel for the informant that the petitioner was convicted and sentenced to seven years imprisonment in another criminal trial. In the present charge sheet, there are eight witnesses are stated to be listed. 7. Despite the adverse circumstances, considering completion of investigation and the length of detention, he can be released on bail at this stage, subject to conditions. 8. Accordingly, the accused-petitioner, named above, shall be released Page No.# 3/3 on bail in connection with Murajar P.S. Case No. 108/2025 under Section 11(2)/109 of BNS, 2023, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.30,000/- with one suitable surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of learned concerned court. 9. The direction for bail is further subject to the following conditions: (a) That the petitioner shall be available for the remaining trial; (b) That the petitioner shall not hamper or tamper with evidence; (c) That the petitioner shall not try to influence any witnesses; and (d) That the petitioner shall not in any manner threaten or harm or harass the family members of the informant’s side and any witnesses. 10. Violation or breach of any condition(s) shall entail cancellation of bail. 11. With the above observations, this bail petition stands allowed and disposed of accordingly. JUDGE Comparing Assistant