KARAN RAJWAR ALIAS KARAN KUMAR RAJWAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./8135/2024 · 2025-01-15
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 26419 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 26419 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B.A. No.8135 of 2024
------ Karan Rajwar @ Karan Kumar Rajwar, aged about 21 years, son of Kartik Rajwar @ Shankar Rajwar, resident of House No.-31, Ward No.13, Chandwari, P.O. + P.S.-Madhupur, Dist.-Deoghar.
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Rahul Ranjan, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. P.D. Agrawal, Spl.P.P.
For the Informant : Mr. Sourabh Kumar Das, Advocate
: Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Advocate
------
Order No.02 Dated- 15/01/2025
Heard the parties.
Apprehending his arrest in connection with Madhupur P.S. Case No.110 of 2024 instituted under Sections 341, 323, 325, 379, 307, 504 & 34 of the Indian Penal Code, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privileges of anticipatory bail.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused person attempted to murder the informant. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that the petitioner has no intention to kill the informant and because of some misunderstanding, this false case has been foisted. It is jointly submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the informant that the matter has been resolved between the parties and informant does not want to proceed with the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the investigation of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be given the privileges of anticipatory bail.
Learned Spl.P.P appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
Considering the submissions of learned counsels and the facts and circumstances stated above, I am inclined to grant privileges of
anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within six weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrendering, he will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., Madhupur in connection with Madhupur P.S. Case No.110 of 2024 with the condition that he will co-operate with the investigation of the case and appear before the investigating officer as and when noticed by him and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the pendency of the case and further conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Abhiraj/