Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010245192017 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/7986/2017 NAGAON DISTRICT MILK PRODUCERS CO-OPERATIVE UNION LTD. REP. BY SRI BIRINCHI KASHYAP, PRESIDENT, MORIKALONG, CHARIALI, VILL and P.O. OFFICE SOUTH HOIBORGAON, R.R.B. ROAD, DIST. NAGAON, ASSAM VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA and 8 ORS. REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF INDIA, CO-OPERATIVE DEPARTMENT, NEW DELHI. 2:THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM DISPUR GUWAHATI -6. 3:THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM ANIMAL HUSBANDRY VETRINARY AND CO-OPERATION DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI -6. 4:THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM DAIRY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI -6. 5:THE DIRECTOR OF DAIRY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT KHANAPARA Page No.# 2/3 GUWAHATI -6. 6:THE REGISTRAR TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-6. 7:THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI -6. 8:NATIONAL DAIRY DEVELOPMENT BOARD HEAD OFFICE R.K. JYOTI PRASAD AGARWALA ROAD PANJABARI GUWAHATI -37. 9:THE WEST ASSAM MILK PRODUCERS COOPERATIVE UNIT LTD. HEAD OFFICE KHANAPRA NARENGI ROAD GUWAHATI -22 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. P SHARMA, MS. H M PHUKAN,MR. M AHMED Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, CO-OP.,ASSTT.S.G.I.,DR. B AHMED,S N SARMA (R9),MR. K KALITA (R9),MR. S CHOWDHURY (R9),MR. M HUSSAIN (R9) BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY ORDER Date : 05-12-2025 There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner today on call. Mr. S.K. Talukdar, learned Standing Counsel, Cooperation Department for the respondent nos. 1, 6 & 7; Mr. J. Handique, learned Junior Government Advocate, Assam for the respondent no. 2; and Mr. W. Rahman, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. K. Khataniar, learned counsel for the respondent no. Page No.# 3/3 9 are present. In the Order dated 26.11.2025 of the Lawazima Court, it is reported that despite granting a number of opportunities to the petitioner to take fresh steps for issuance of notice to the respondent no. 8, no steps have been taken on behalf of the petitioner. As no interest is found to have been shown by the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. JUDGE Comparing Assistant