Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 26418 (MAD)

Tmt.D.Malarkodi, v. The District Collector,

WP/18338/2016 · 2025-04-25

C Saravanan

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 18338 of 2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 25-04-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN W.P. No. 18338 of 2016 in W.M.P Nos.16047 and 16048 of 2016 1. Tmt.D.Malarkodi, W/o.Tr.Dhanapaul, Siruvallur Village, Kalasapakkam Taluk, Thiruvannamalai District. Petitioner Vs 1. The District Collector, O/o.The District Collector, Thiruvannamalai District. 2.The Commissioner, Kalasapakkam Panchayat Union, Kalasapakkam, Thiruvannamalai District. 3.The Block Development Officer, O/o.The Block Development Officer, Kalasapakkam, Thiruvannamalai District. 4.The Headmaster, Siruvallur Panchayat Union Primary School, Kalasapakkam Panchayat Union, Kalasapakkam, Thiruvannamalai District. Respondents https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 18338 of 2016 PRAYER Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records relevant to the order in Na.Ka.Va.Aa1/ 5520/2013 dated 16.03.2016 passed by the 2nd respondent and the same was confirmed by the 1st respondent in his proceedings in Savuthi-1/ Na.Ka.4081/2016 dated 22.04.2016 and quash the same as illegal, improper and against the natural justice and thereby direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner into her service from 12.03.2016 and payback all service benefits to her. For Petitioner(s): Mr.A.Rajesh Kanna For R1: Mr.R.U.Dinesh Raj Kumar For R2 & R3: Mr.P.Chinna Durai ORDER This writ petition has been filed to quash the order in Na.Ka.Va.Aa1/ 5520/2013 dated 16.03.2016 passed by the 2nd respondent and the same was confirmed by the 1st respondent in his proceedings in Savuthi-1/ Na.Ka.4081/2016 dated 22.04.2016 and y direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner into her service from 12.03.2016 and payback all service benefits. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition has been rendered infructuous subsequent to the impugned order passed by this Court, reinstating the petitioner into service. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 18338 of 2016 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner has made an endorsement to that effect. 4. Recording the same, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Connected WMP is closed. Costs made easy. 25-04-2025 vca Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 18338 of 2016 C.SARAVANAN J. vca To 1.The District Collector, O/o.The District Collector, Thiruvannamalai District. 2.The Commissioner, Kalasapakkam Panchayat Union, Kalasapakkam, Thiruvannamalai District. 3.The Block Development Officer, O/o.The Block Development Officer, Kalasapakkam, Thiruvannamalai District. 4.The Headmaster, Siruvallur Panchayat Union Primary School, Kalasapakkam Panchayat Union, Kalasapakkam, Thiruvannamalai District. W.P. No. 18338 of 2016 in W.M.P Nos.16047 and 16048 of 2016 25.04.2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis