Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:23986 WP No. 14002 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM WRIT PETITION NO. 14002 OF 2025 (LB-BMP)
BETWEEN:
1.
VINAYA .B.N W/O SANTHOSH BALASUBRAMANYA AGED 31 YEARS R/A NO. 422, 5TH CROSS 3RD B MAIN, 3RD BLOCK KALYAN NAGAR, BANGALORE-560043. …PETITIONER
(BY SRI. KANNUR, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR SRI. HIRAN KRISHNASWAMY, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE COMMISSIONER BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE N R SQUARE, BENGALURU - 560002.
2.
THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE HOODI SUB DIVISION BENGALURU - 560048.
3.
SMT. CHANDRIKA D. REDDY W/O LATE H.K. DWARAKANATH REDDY AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS B BLOCK, KEERTHI SIGNATURE APARTMENTS ITPL MAIN ROAD, HOODI, WHITEFIELD BENGALURU - 560048.
Digitally signed by AL BHAGYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:23986 WP No. 14002 of 2025
4.
SMT. HARSHITHA DWARAK W/O K.V. KARTHIK REDDY D/O LATE H.K. DWARAKANATH REDDY AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS R/AT NO. 708-709, B BLOCK KEERTHI SIGNATURE APARTMENTS ITPL MAIN ROAD, HOODI WHITEFIELD, BENGALURU - 560048. …RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. PAWAN KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2;
SRI. G.L. VISHWANATH, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR SMT. NIDHI M. PATIL, ADVOCATE FOR R3 AND R4)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO CONSIDER THE ACTIONS TAKEN BY THE PETITIONER IN DEMOLISHING THE ENTIRE STRUCTURE IN THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY, TO BE IN FULL COMPLIANCE WITH THE UNDERTAKING GIVEN BEFORE THIS HONBLE COURT IN W.P.NO.21749/2024 VIDE ORDER DATED 14.11.2024 (ENCLOSED AS ANNEXURE-A) AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
ORAL ORDER This matter was heard extensively, and while reserving orders, this Court had put the petitioner on notice regarding the proposed imposition of exemplary costs, taking serious note of the petitioner having instituted the writ petition without disclosing any cause of action.
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:23986 WP No. 14002 of 2025
2. However, at this stage, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks leave of the Court to withdraw the writ petition. A memo to that effect has been filed.
3. Though the learned counsel for the respondent has raised strong objections to the withdrawal, this Court is inclined to show indulgence in the interest of justice.
4. Accordingly, the memo for withdrawal is taken on record. The writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn, subject to the petitioner paying costs of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) to the Karnataka High Court Advocates’ Clerks Benevolent Fund within one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this
order. Sd/- (SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM) JUDGE
CA List No.: 1 Sl.No.: 2