1 2025:CGHC:18640 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3096 of 2022 1 - Rahis Khan S/o Chhiddan Khan Aged About 43 Years R/o Village Jogidongri Sarbahara, Tahsil Pendraroad, District : Gaurela-Pendra- Marwahi, Chhattisgarh. --- Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through It's Secretary, Department Of Revenue And Disaster Management, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Collector/upper Collector District Gaurela-Pendra-Marwahi, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Pendraroad, District Gaurela- Pendra-Marwahi, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Naib Tahsildar Pendraroad, District Gaurela-Pendra-Marwahi, Chhattisgarh. --- Respondent(s) Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT 2 WPC No. 3886 of 2022 1 - Yasmin Khan W/o Late Mohd. Jamil Khan Aged About 28 Years R/o Village Jogidongri Sarbahara, Tahsil Pendraroad District Gourela - Pendra- Marwahi, Chhattisgarh. ---Petitioner(s) Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of Revenue And Disaster Management, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - Collector / Upper Collector District Gourela - Pendra- Marwahi, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue), Pendraroad District Gourela - Pendra- Marwahi, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Naib Tahsildar Pendraroad District Gourela - Pendra- Marwahi, Chhattisgarh. --- Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. C.K. Sahu, Advocate. For Respondent(s)/State : Mr. Praveen Das, Dy. A.G. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 24/04/2025 1. By way of this petition, the petitioners have prayed for following reliefs:- “(i) That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash impugned order dated 29.03.2022 passed by the learned Upper Collector, District Gourela-Pendra- Marwahi, (C.G.), in the interest of justice. 3 (ii) That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to pay compensation amount of Rs. 4,00,000/- as per circular dated 09.06.2015 within stipulated time, in the interest of justice. (iii) Any other relief which may be suitable in the facts and circumstances of the case, may also be granted, in the interest of justice.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing for some time seeks liberty of this Court to file appropriate application before the appropriate forum having territorial jurisdiction. 3. Permission is granted. 4. No objection has been raised from other sides. 5. Accordingly, both the writ petitions are dismissed with the aforesaid liberty. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat