Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:23711 WP No. 13908 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.13908 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN:
1. GURAPPA S/O LATE MUNISHAMAPPA AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS R/AT SUNNAGHATAHALLI VILLAGE, TUBAGARE HOBLI, DODDABALLAPURA TALUK, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT-561205. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. CHOKKAREDDY., ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA UNDER SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT M.S. BUILDING AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU -560 001.
2.
THE TAHSILDAR ALSO SECRETARY OF RUC COMMITTEE DODDABALLAPURA TALUK BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT - 561205.
3.
THE CHAIRMAN LAND GRANT COMMITTEE FOR UNAUTHORISED OCCUPATION TALUK BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT - 561205.
Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:23711 WP No. 13908 of 2025
…RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. NAVYA SHEKAR, AGA)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT TO RESPONDENTS NO.2 AND 3 FOR CONSIDER THE ANNEXURE-A DATED 24.11.1996, THE APPLICATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER IN FORM NO.53, IN RESPECT OF SY.NO.32, MEASURING 5 GUNTAS OF KARANALA VILLAGE, TUBAGERE HOBLI, DODDABALLAPURA TALUK.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
ORAL ORDER
1. This writ petition is filed by the petitioner praying to direct respondent Nos.2 and 3 to consider the application filed by the petitioner dated 24.11.1996 in Form-53, in respect of the subject land, as per Annexure-A.
2. Learned Additional Government Advocate submitted that the application filed by the petitioner in Form-53 has been rejected by the respondent - authorities. In support of her contention, learned Additional Government Advocate has filed a
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:23711 WP No. 13908 of 2025
memo with documents. Learned Additional Government Advocate further submitted that the petition may be dismissed has having become infructuous, in view of rejection of petitioner's application in Form-53, as per the memo dated
02.07.2025.
3. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed. However, it is open for the petitioner to take recourse to law, in a manner known to law.
SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE
sac List No.: 1 Sl No.: 31