Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010226672022 2025:GAU-AS:14413 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/617/2022 DEBESWAR BURAGOHAIN AND 4 ORS. S/O LATE KANAK BURAGOHAIN, R/O LICHUBARI, DIST.- JORHAT, ASSAM, PIN- 785604. 2: CHANDAN BURAGOHAIN S/O LATE SARBESWAR BURAGOHAIN R/O LICHUBARI DIST.- JORHAT ASSAM PIN- 785608. 3: BANDANA BURAGOHAIN D/O LATE SARBESWAR BURAGOHAIN R/O AMULAPATTY T.L.B. ROAD C/O BISWAJIT KARMAKAR SIVASAGAR DIST.- DIVASAGAR ASSAM PIN- 785640. 4: RUMI BURAGOHAIN W/O LATE NANDAN BURAGOHAIN R/O LICHUBARI P.O.- CHINAMORA DIST.- JORHAT ASSAM PIN- 785608. 5: HIMAKSHI BURAGOHAIN D/O LATE NANDAN BURAGOHAIN Page No.# 2/3 R/O LICHUBARI P.O.- CHINAMORA DIST.- JORHAT ASSAM PIN- 785608 VERSUS ASHOK KUMAR BARMAN AND 3 ORS. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (REVENUE), JORHAT, DIST.- JORHAT, ASSAM, PIN- 785608. 2:PALLABJYOTI DAS CIRCLE OFFICER JORHAT (WEST) REVENUE CIRCLE JORHAT PIN- 785608. 3:NITYANANDA GOGOI S/O LATE PUTU GOGOI R/O BORBHETA CHAPORI P.O. AND P.S.- JORHAT DIST.- JORHAT ASSAM PIN- 785608. 4:DEBESWAR GOGOI S/O LATE PUTU GOGOI R/O BORBHETA CHAPORI P.O. AND P.S- JORHAT DIST.- JORHAT ASSAM PIN- 785608 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. B J GHOSH, MR. B HAZARIKA Advocate for the Respondent : MR H K MAHANTA (r-2), MR H K MAHANTA,MR H K MAHANTA,MR. K R BORA (R3, R4) BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR ORDER 27.10.2025 None appears for the petitioner on call. 2. Mr H K Mahanta, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 2, submits that the said respondent has filed an affidavit in response to the petition. Page No.# 3/3 3. Mr K R Bora, learned counsel appearing for the respondent Nos. 3 and 4 submitted that the writ petition bearing WP(C) No. 4749/2020, has been disposed of on 23.06.2023, and the writ appeal preferred against the said order being Writ Appeal No. 26/2024, has already been disposed of on 05.06.2024. 4. The order of which violation had been alleged was with regard to an interim order directing the parties to maintain status quo. 5. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the other respondents that with the disposal of the writ petition and also with the disposal of the writ appeal, the question of committing violation of the interim orders to maintain status quo, now no longer need any adjudication. 6. In view of the absence of the learned counsel for the petitioner and also in view of the orders passed in WP(C) No. 4749/2020 and Writ Appeal No. 26/2024, this contempt petition is closed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant