Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 26410 (KAR)

SRI MAHIMA DASEGOWDA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/16801/2021 · 2025-01-17

M G S Kamal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:1909 WP No. 16801 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL WRIT PETITION NO. 16801 OF 2021 (LA-KIADB) BETWEEN: SRI MAHIMA DASEGOWDA S/O LATE MAHIMARANGAIAH AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS RESIDING AT KENGAL KEMPOHALLI VILLAGE BANGALORE-562 111. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. KRISHNA MURTHY V.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE, M S BUILDING AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU-560 001. 2. KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD KIADB NO.49, 4TH AND 5TH FLOOR, EAST WING, KHANIJA BHAVAN RACE COURSE ROAD BENGALURU-560 001 REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN. 3. SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITON OFFICER KIADB, NO.39 SHANTHI GRUHA BHARATH SCOUT AND GUIDE BUILDING Digitally signed by SUMA B N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:1909 WP No. 16801 of 2021 4TH FLOOR, PALACE ROAD BANGALORE-560 001 …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. B. SUKANYA BALIGA, AGA FOR R1; SRI. H.L. PRADEEP KUMAR., ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE NOTIFICATION U/S 3(1) (1(3) AND SECTION 28(1) OF KIADB ACT 1966) VIDE DATED 05.11.2020 ISSUED BY THE R1 ANNEXURE-A. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he would not press the relief at paragraphs a, b and c for the present. He would be satisfied if a direction issued to the respondent - KIADB to respond to the representation dated 21.01.2021 given by the petitioner at Annexure-J. He further submits petitioner may also be given liberty to file a fresh representation. 2. Submission is taken on record. 3. In that view of the matter, petition is disposed of reserving liberty to the petitioner to make a fresh - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:1909 WP No. 16801 of 2021 representation within 15 days from the date of receipt of the certified copy of the order. The respondent -KIADB to consider the representation made by the petitioner, within four (4) weeks thereafter and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. Sd/- (M.G.S. KAMAL) JUDGE RU, List No.: 1 Sl No.: 23