- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:23713 WP No. 13769 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.13769 OF 2023 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. MOHAN. C. R. S/O RANGASHAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, R/AT CHOLAPURA VILLAGE HEBBUR HOBLI, TUMKUR TALUK TUMKUR DISTRICT-572120. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. VASANTH KUMAR H.T., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M S BUILDING AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU-560001 REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER TUMAKURU DISTRICT TUMAKURU-572101. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER TUMAKURU SUB DIVISION TUMAKURU DISTRICT TUMAKURU-572101. Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:23713 WP No. 13769 of 2023 4. THE TAHASILDAR TUMAKURU DISTRICT TUMAKURU-572101. 5. SMT. MAHABOOB JAN W/O SRI ABDUL REHAMAN D/O LATE MAIMUNNISA AND BAIJU SAB AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, R/AT KALAMMANAGIRI ROAD, HEBBUR VILLAGE, HEBBUR HOBALI, TUMAKURU TALUK TUMAKURU DISTRICT-572120. 6. SMT. MAHABOOB JAN W/O SRI MOHAMMED GHOUSE D/O LATE MAIMUNNISA AND BAIJU SAB AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/AT HOSAMANE ROAD HANUMANTHANAGAR BHADRAVATHI TOWN SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT-577301. 7. SMT. FATHIMA W/O SRI SYED MOHAMMED D/O LATE MAIMUNNISA AND BAIJU SAB AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/AT BADESHA PALYA, GULURU HBOLI, TUMAKURU TALUK TUMAKURU DISTRICT-572122. 8. SMT. ABZAL BI W/O LATE PYARE JAAN AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/AT KALAMMANAGIRI ROAD HEBBUR VILLAGE, HEBBUR HOBLI, TUMAKURU TALUK, TUMAKURU DISTRICT-572120. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:23713 WP No. 13769 of 2023 …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. SAVITHRAMMA, AGA FOR R1 TO R4; SRI. FAYAZ SAB B.G., ADVOCATE FOR R5 & R8; R6 & R7 SERVED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.3 IN VIDE NO.C.M.CR.139/23-24 DATED 25/05/2023 VIDE ANNEXURE-V. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER 1. In this writ petition, petitioner is assailing the order dated 25.05.2025 passed by respondent No.3. 2. It is submitted by Sri. Fayaz Sab B.G., learned counsel for respondent Nos.5 and 8 that the petitioner has no locus-standi to maintain the writ petition as the petitioner herein is neither owner of the property in question nor connected with the schedule property. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:23713 WP No. 13769 of 2023 3. In that view of the matter, taking into consideration that nothing is forthcoming from the averments made in the writ petition with regard to right of the petitioner over the property in question, the writ petition is dismissed. 4. In view of dismissal of the main matter, pending I.A.1/2025 does not survive for consideration. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE sac List No.: 1 Sl No.: 25