Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010278612025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/2975/2025 NAJIM UDDIN AND 2 ORS. S/O ALAUDDIN, R/O VILL DIGHALJARUNI, PS AND PS DOBOKA, DIST HOJAI, ASSAM 2: NAJ UDDIN S/O ALAUDDIN R/O VILL DIGHALJARUNI PS AND PS DOBOKA DIST HOJAI ASSAM 3: NASIR UDDIN S/O ALAUDDIN R/O VILL DIGHALJARUNI PS AND PS DOBOKA DIST HOJAI ASSA VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE LEARNED PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : TAWHID LASKAR, MR. D K AGARWALA,ASHRAFUL BORBHUYAN Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, Page No.# 2/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJAN MONI KALITA ORDER Date : 18.12.2025 Heard Mr. T. Laskar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the accused- applicants. Also heard Mr. P. Borthakur, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor, representing the State respondent. This is an application filed under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023, praying for granting bail to the accused-applicants in connection with Doboka P.S. Case No. 180/2025, registered under Sections 299/196 of the BNS, 2023, read with Sections 5(1)/7/13 of the Assam Cattle Preservation Act, 2021. An FIR was lodged on 15.09.2025, by one S.I. Anupam Borah before the Doboka Police Station, alleging that on receipt of specific information, at about 8.30 AM, about involvement of the alleged accused of running a slaughtering house at Dihaljaroni village and illegally selling and transporting beef meat, the police went to the said place and recovered 25 kgs of suspected beef meat. It was alleged that the aforesaid place falls within a radius of 5 KM from Burigaon Kali Mandir and as per law, slaughtering is prohibited within the range of 5 KM from any religious institutions as per the provision of Assam Cattle Preservation Act. The police seized the aforementioned quantity of beef meat and registered Doboka P.S. Case No. 180/2025 under the aforesaid sections. The present accused-applicants has approached this court by filing anticipatory bail application being AB No. 2616/2025, which was, after consideration, rejected by this Court, vide order dated 18.11.2025. It is seen that there is no new ground made out in the instant application and therefore, the instant anticipatory bail application is rejected and dismissed. Page No.# 3/3 JUDGE Comparing Assistant