APHC010373202025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 19252/2025 Between: 1. K T DAWOOD, /O.SUFI MOLISAB, AGED 55 YEARS,OCC.BUSINESS, R/O. H.NO.17/135-35, RADHAKRISHNA TALKIES ROAD, KURNOOL CITY, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 2. KORRAPATI VIJAY KUMAR, S/O.K.SUBRAMNYAM, AGED 50 YEARS,OCC. BUSINESS, R/O.40-790-3, NEHRU NAGAR,N.R.PETA, KURNOOL CITY,KURNOOL DISTRICT. 3. KORRAPATI ANURADHA, W/O. KORRAPATI VIJAY KUMAR, AGED 37 YEARS, OCC, HOUSE WIFE, R/O.40-790-3, NEHRU NAGAR,N.R.PETA, KURNOOL CITY,KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI,GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, KURNOOL CITY, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 4. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KURNOOL CITY, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, 4TH TOWN POLICE STATION, 2 KURNOOL CITY, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 6. P DAWOOD KHANPATHAN DAWOOD KHAN, S/O. LATE MAHABOOB KHAN, AGED 70 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/0.H.N0.39-7-A-5, K.V.R. GARDEN, KURNOOL CITY, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ, order or directions, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in not taking action on the 1 St petitioner representation dated 10-05-2025 which was made against in interference of the 5TH respondent Police in Civil disputes, calling, threatening the petitioners to come to his police station to settle the civil disputes in his police station though the litigation pending before the Competent Civil Court, Criminal Court and this Honble court, which is illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, contrary to law and violation of Articles 14, 16 30C)-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents herein not to interfere in Civil disputes, calling, threatening the petitioners to come to the police stations to settle the civil dispute in police stations and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to grant the interim directions directing the respondents 1 to 4 to take action on the 1®* petitioner representation dated 10-05-2025 further direction to the 5*^ respondent not to interfere in civil disputes, calling, threatening the petitioners to come to his police station, pending disposal of the Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. CHALLA SIVASANKAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer: “….to issue a Writ, order or directions, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in not taking action on the 1 St petitioner representation dated 10-05-2025 which was made against in interference of the 5TH respondent Police in Civil disputes, calling, threatening the petitioners to come to his police station to settle the civil disputes in his police station though the litigation pending before the Competent Civil Court, Criminal Court and this Honble court, which is illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, contrary to law and violation of Articles 14, 16 30C)-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents herein not to interfere in Civil disputes, calling, threatening the petitioners to come to the police stations to settle the civil dispute in police stations and pass.…” 2. Heard Sri Challa Siva Krishna, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri V.Farook, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the police are not taking any action on the representation dated 10.05.2025 made by the 1st petitioner and the police are calling the petitioners to the police station regarding the civil dispute. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. 5. Considering the submissions made, this writ petition is disposed of. However, the police are directed not to interfere in the civil dispute without following the due process of law. 4 As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATAJYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 31.07.2025 MH 5 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 29 WRIT PETITION NO: 19252/2025 Dt.31.07.2025 MH