[2025:RJ-JP:32676] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9797/2025 Navneet Sharma S/o Shri Hanuman Prasad Sharma, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Village Khyali, Police Station Malsisar, District Jhunjhunu, At Present Employee Of I.m.l. Containers Pvt. Ltd. Chirota Road, Opposite Shiv Mandir, Riico Area Bagru, Jaipur. (At Present In Central Jail Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kunal Jaiman For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP with Mr. Shubham Kumar Sain, AAAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 13/08/2025 1. This instant application for bail filed under Section 483 of BNSS by the applicant-accused Navneet Sharma S/o Shri Hanuman Prasad Sharma in FIR No. 175/2025 dated 23.04.2025 registered at P.S. Bagru, District -Jaipur (West), whereby the applicant-accused was charged under Sections 309 (4), 61 (2) and 3 (5) of BNS. 2. The applicant was arrested and is in judicial custody since his arrest. The Court below has dismissed the bail application. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant relying upon grounds raised in bail application submits that the applicant is innocent and falsely implicated in the present case. He further submits that the maximum allegation on this [2025:RJ-JP:32676] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-9797/2025] applicant is for rendering assistance post incident to accused Kanhaiya Lal Sharma @ Chiku Pandit. He further submits that this applicant-accuses is not involved in the incident of robbery or dacoity committed on 22.04.2025 and he was not found involved by police. He further submits that as per Investigating Officer, Kanhaiya Lal Sharma @ Chiku Pandit has lured present applicant-accused to help him in fleeing from the jurisdiction. He further submits that police has recorded information under Section 23 (2) of BSA, which also indicate that motorcycle of Ramavtar Kumawat was used by this applicant-accused to help Kanhaiya Lal Sharma @ Chiku Pandit. He further submits that there is no criminal antecedents against the present applicant accused. 4. Aforesaid contentions were opposed by learned Public Prosecutor and he submitted report received from P.S. Bagru, District Jaipur (West). 5. Heard learned counsel for applicant and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record. 6. On basis of report lodged by complainant Manmohan Sharma about robbery on 22.04.2025 by armed accused, a report has registered and during investigation, the persons were identified, which includes Sohail, Kanhaiya Lal @ Chiku Pandit, Pyare Lal and Koshal Singh. During investigation, it was also found that Kanhaiya Lal @ Chiku Pandit was helped post incident by Yogesh Sharma and Navneet Sharma. Police has already filed a charge-sheet and present applicant- accused is in custody since 27.04.2025. The further proceedings will take its own time, therefore, looking to [2025:RJ-JP:32676] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-9797/2025] entirety of facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, the Court deems it appropriate to grant bail to the applicant-accused Navneet Sharma S/o Shri Hanuman Prasad Sharma. 7. Thus, the instant bail application filed on behalf of applicant- accused Navneet Sharma S/o Shri Hanuman Prasad Sharma, is hereby allowed and the applicant-accused Navneet Sharma S/o Shri Hanuman Prasad Sharma, is ordered to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of ₹50,000/- with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant-accused shall not tamper with evidence or influence the witness in any manner. (ii) The applicant-accused shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not repeat any criminal offence punishable under the Law. (iii) The applicant-accused shall attend the hearing of the Trial Court on the date fixed by the Trial court or as and when asked to appear before the Trial Court. (iv) In case of any violation of above conditions, the bail granted to the applicant-accused shall be liable to be cancelled. 8. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the Trial Court through E-mail. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J GAURAV /348