Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 26395 (BOM)

CHHAYA MURLIDHAR TARWADE AND ORS v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH COLLECTOR LATUR @ SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFFICER, LATUR AND OR

CA/9797/2024 · 2025-07-22

Shri Shailesh P Brahme

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 1006.CA-9797-2024.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 1006 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9797 OF 2024 IN FA/558/2024 CHHAYA MURLIDHAR TARWADE AND ORS VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH COLLECTOR LATUR @ SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFFICER, LATUR AND OR ... Advocate for the Applicants : Mr.Pahilwan Gautam J AGP for Respondent/State : Mr.D.B.Bhange Advocate for Respondent No.3 to 5:Mr.S.S.Chillarge … CORAM : SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J. DATE : 22nd JULY 2025 PER COURT : . This application is for intervention by the persons who also claim to be legal heirs of deceased/Baliram Devkare. Respondent Nos.3 to 5 also claim themselves to be legal heirs of deceased/ Baliram Devkare 2. By the orders of this Court they received part of the amount. It is contended by the learned counsel for the applicants that claim of his applicants is at par with Respondent Nos.3 to 5. 3. Learned counsel Mr.Chillarge for respondents submits that Respondent No.4 has withdrawn the appearance of the counsel and Respondent Nos.3 and 5 are not responding. It would be up to the 2025:BHC-AUG:19382 2 1006.CA-9797-2024.doc learned counsel to take necessary legal steps against his clients. 4. It appears that Respondent Nos.3 to 5 received part of the compensation. Prima facie case is made out by the applicants. 5. Civil application is allowed in terms of prayer clause ‘B’. 6. It would be open to parties to carry out necessary amendments for impleading the present applicants as Respondent Nos.6 to 9. 7. List this matter on 19.08.2025. [ SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.] vsj..