DEVIREDDY GURIVI REDDY v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP/19384/2025 · 2025-08-04
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 26391 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 26391 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
APHC010371912025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 19384/2025 Between:
1. DEVIREDDY GURIVI REDDY, S/O. ESWAR REDDY, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS,
R/O. D.NO.22/236, NAGULAKATTA STREET, JAMMALAMADUGU TOWN, YSR (KADAPA) DISTRICT
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOME, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELGAPUDI, AMRAVATHI, ANDHRA PRADESH.
2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, AMRAVATHI.
3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, YSR (KADAPA) DISTRICT.
4. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, JAMMALAMADUGU.
YSR (KADAPA) DISTRICT.
5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, JAMMALAMADUGU URBAN POLICE STATION, JAMMALAMADUGU. YSR (KADAPA) DISTRICT.
6. DEVIREDDY PEEDA GURIVI REDDY, S/O. LATE GURIVI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.1/35, SESHAREDDYPALLE VILLAGE, JAMMALAMADUGU MANDAL. YSR (KADAPA) DISTRICT
7. DEVIREDDY CHINNA GURUSEKHAR REDDY, S/O. PEDDA GURIVI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS,
R/O. D.NO.1/91, SESHAREDDYPALLE VILLAGE, JAMMALAMADUGU MANDAL. YSR
2
(KADAPA) DISTRICT
8. DEVIREDDY BHARGAV REDDY, S/O. CHINNA GURUSEKHAR REDDY, AGED ABOUT 19 YEARS,
R/O. D.NO.1/91, SESHAREDDYPALLE VILLAGE, JAMMALAMADUGU MANDAL. YSR (KADAPA) DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents more particularly respondent No.3 to 5 in not registering the FIR and not taking action on the petitioner's complaint dated 30.06.2025 (01.07.2025) and not taking steps to prevent unlawful interference by the respondents No.6 to 8 as illegal, arbitrary and in violation of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents more particularly respondent No.3 to 5 to register the FIR based on the petitioner's complaint dated 30.06.2025 (01.07.2025) and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents more particularly respondent No.3 to 5 to take action on the complaint dated 30.06.2025 (01.07.2025) filed by the petitioner. pending disposal of the main writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. SHAIK MOHAMMED ISMAIL Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME
3
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 19384/2025
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for:
“…pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents more particularly respondent No.3 to 5 in not registering the FIR and not taking action on the petitioner's complaint dated 30.06.2025 (01.07.2025) and not taking steps to prevent unlawful interference by the respondents No.6 to 8 as illegal, arbitrary and in violation of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents more particularly respondent No.3 to 5 to register the FIR based on the petitioner's complaint dated 30.06.2025 (01.07.2025) and pass…”
2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that since the matter is of civil in nature, crime is not registered on the representation of the petitioner against the unofficial respondents.
3.
Learned Counsel for the petitioner would submit that recording the same, the petition may be disposed of, giving liberty to the petitioner to pursue the matter before appropriate forum.
4. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the petitioner is at liberty to recourse his remedies according to law before the appropriate forum. No order as to costs.
4
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 05.08.2025 UPS
5
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
W.P.No.19384 of 2025
Dated.05.08.2025
UPS
150