Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2639 (HP)

SATISH KUMAR v. NIPUN JINDAL AND ANOTHER

CMP/30997/2025 · 2026-01-07

Sandeep Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Satish Kumar v. Dr. Nipun Jindal and Anr. CMP No.30997 of 2025 in COPC No. 594 of 2025 7.1.2026 Present: Mr. Vijay Chaudhary, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Rahul Thakur, Advocate, for the respondents. While placing on record communication dated nil issued under the signature of Executive Director, Himachal Road Transport Corporation, Shimla, Mr. Rahul Thakur, Advocate, states that petitioner has been paid interest @7% on account of delayed payment on DCRG and leave encashment. In view of the above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant application and accordingly, same is disposed of. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to file appropriate proceedings before appropriate court of law qua surviving grievance, if any. January 7, 2026 (Sandeep Sharma), manjit Judge