Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 26388 (PNJ)

INDERJEET SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CWP/4202/2025 · 2025-02-15

Aman Chaudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN TH 113 Inderjeet Singh State of Punjab CORAM: HO Present: Mr Mr *** AMAN CHAUD 1. Pra promote the peti 2. Lea present petition submitted, how placed on the Jankiraman, Punjab and ot direction may b manner, to whi made. 3. In v case, this petitio decide the rep judgments, with the authorities w doing so, after n benefit forthwit same shall cont thereupon. 15.02.2025 ashok Wh Wh N THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB CHANDIGARH CWP-420 Date of de Singh Versus unjab and others HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN Mr. Jatinder Pal Singh, Advocate fo Mr. Swapan Shorey, DAG, Punjab *** HAUDHARY, J. (Oral) Prayer made in the present petition he petitioner to the post of Divisional S Learned counsel submits that rega etition, a representation dated 20.01 however, the same has yet not ev n the judgments passed in the cas an, 1991(3) SCT 317 (Annexure P11 nd others, 2019(3) SCT 29. He th may be given to the respondents to d o which learned State counsel has no In view of the above and without co petition is hereby disposed of with representation dated 20.01.2025 within a period of 2 months, which t ies would not address in a just, fa after notice and hearing offered to hi rthwith. Needless to say, if the order ll contain reasons and the petitioner s ( AMAN Whether speaking/reasoned : Ye Whether reportable : Ye NJAB AND HARYANA AT GARH 4202-2025 (O&M) te of decision: 15.02.2025 ..Petitioner ..Respondents AMAN CHAUDHARY cate for the petitioner. unjab. etition is for directing the respondents ional Soil Conservation Officer. at regarding the claim as raised in th 20.01.2025, Annexure P-6, has bee evoked any response. Reliance case of Union of India vs. K re P11) and Balwant Ram vs. State o He thus, on instructions, prays that to decide the same in a time boun has no objection to the limited pray hout commenting upon the merits of th with a direction to the respondents .2025, taking note of the aforesa hich this Court has no reason to believ ust, fair and reasonable manner. Upo him and if found entitled, grant th orders are adverse to his interest, th oner shall be free to seek legal redre MAN CHAUDHARY ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No dents to d in the as been iance is vs. KV State of s that a e bound prayer of the s to foresaid believe r. Upon rant the rest, the redress ASHOK KUMAR 2025.02.15 14:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document