JAYANTHI SUJATHA ALIAS SUBBALAKSHMI RACHAKONDA v. THE STATE OF AP
WP/19180/2025 · 2025-07-29
Subba Reddy Satti
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 26388 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 26388 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010373642025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 19180/2025 Between:
1. JAYANTHI SUJATHA ALIAS SUBBALAKSHMI RACHAKONDA, W/O.
LATE RAMACHANDRA RAO, AGED 68 YEARS, R/O. FLAT NO. GF- 101, D.NO. 7-9, SR PARADISE, BAKKANNAPALEM,VISAKHAPATNAM,
VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 2. J.S.V.V.N. MURTHY,, S/O. LATE RAMACHANDRA RAO, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. FLAT NO. GF-101, D.NO. 7-9, SR PARADISE,
BAKKANNAPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 3. J.S.V.S. SREEDHAR,, S/O. LATE RAMACHANDRA RAO, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCC.BUSINESS, R/O. FLAT NO. GF-101, D.NO. 7-9, SR PARADISE,
BAKKANNAPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 4. SMT. R.S.V.S. LAKSHMI,, W/O. SANKARA PRASAD, AGED 49 YEARS, R/O.
Q.NO. 312A, STEEL PLANT QUARTERS, UKKUNAGARAM, VISAKHAPATNAM. (ALL THE PETITIONERS ARE REP. BY THEIR GPA HOLDER, PEELA RAMUNAIDU, S/O. VENKATA RAMANA,AGED 55 YEARS,
R/O. NAD KOTHA ROAD, VISAKHAPATNAM)
...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. THE STATE OF AP, REP.BY ITS PRI. SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS,
VELAGAPUDI,
SRS,J W.P.No.19180 of 2025
AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE COMPOUND, ANAKAPALLI, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT. 3. THE R D O, NARSIPATNAM DIVISION, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, ROLUGUNTA MANDAL, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ or direction or order one more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in taking steps to dispossess the petitioners from their lands situated in Katha No. 80, bearing Sy.No's 22- 1, 25-3, 62-1 and 63-1 totaling to an extent of Ac.3.02 cents, Katha No. 81 bearing Sy.No.51-2 to an extent of Ac. 1.04 cents, in Katha No. 97 bearing Sy.No. 45-4, 49-1, to an extent of Ac. 2.35 cents, in Katha No. 98 bearing Sy.No. 42-2 to an extent of Ac. 0.03 cents, in Katha No. 99 bearing Sy.No's . 32-1, 33-7 to an extent of Ac.
1.67 cents, in Katha No. 10001 bearing Sy.No's 1-2,3B,3C,3D, 14-1,14-2,19,19-2, 19-3,19-4, 20- 2B, 20-3, 23-1, 25-2, 26-13, 26-14, 29-1, 29-3, 31-8, 34-17, 34-3, 34-7, 36-2, 37- 1, 37-10, 37-2, 37-6, 37-9, 40-3, 41-1, 41-2, 4-2, 42-1, 43, 44- 1, 46-2, 49-3, 51-1, 53-1, 55, 56-1, 56-2, 58-3, 60-1, 6-1, 6-2, 62-8, 63- 4, 63-5, 67-1, 67-2, 67-3, 69-1, 70-2, 71-10, 71-11, 71-16, 71-18, 71-5, 71-7, 71-9, 72-5, 72-7, 75- 3, 76-15, 76-2, 76-8, 77-11, 77-12, 77-15, 77-3, 77-8, 80-10, totaling to an extent of Ac.29.06 cents of Rajannapeta Village, Rolugunta Mandal, Anakapalli District, as illegal, arbitrary. contrary to principles of natural Justice and in violation of Articles of 14,21 and 300-A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to take any coercive steps in respect of the Petitioners lands situated in Rajannapeta Village, Rolugunta Mandal, Anakapalli District and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to dispossess the Petitioners from their lands situated in Katha No. 80, bearing Sy.No's 22-1, 25-3, 62-1 & 63-1 totaling to an extent of Ac.3.02 cents, Katha No. 81 bearing Sy.No.51-2 to an extent of Ac. 1.04 cents, in Katha No. 97 bearing Sy.No. 45-4,49-1, to an extent of Ac. Page 3 of 5 SRS,J W.P.No.19180 of 2025
2.35 cents, in Katha No. 98 bearing Sy.No. 42-2 to an extent of Ac. 0.03 cents, in Katha No. 99 bearing Sy.No's . 32-1, 33-7 to an extent of Ac.
1.67 cents, in Katha No. 10001 bearing Sy.No's 1-2,3B,3C,3D, 14-1,14-2,19,19-2, 19-3,19-4, 20-2B, 20-3, 23-1, 25-2, 26-13, 26-14, 29-1, 29-3, 31-8, 34-17, 34- 3, 34-7, 36-2, 37-1, 37- 10, 37-2, 37-6, 37-9, 40-3, 41-1, 41-2, 4-2, 42-1, 43, 44-1, 46-2, 49-3, 51-1, 53-1, 55, 56-1, 56-2, 58-3, 60-1, 6-1, 6-2, 62-8, 63-4, 63-5, 67-1, 67-2, 67-3, 69-1, 70-2, 71-10, 71-11, 71-16, 71-18, 71-5, 71-7, 71- 9, 72-5, 72-7, 75-3, 76-15, 76-2, 76-8, 77-11, 77-12, 77-15, 77-3, 77-8, 80- 10, totaling to an extent of Ac.29.06 cents of Rajannapeta Village, Rolugunta Mandal, Anakapalli District, pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. SIVA RAMA KRISHNA KOLLURU Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following:
:: ORDER ::
Heard Sri K.Siva Rama Krishna, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri B.V. Satyanarayana, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, appeared for the respondents. 2.
Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the 1st petitioner’s mother, by name Rachakonda Bramarambha, owned Ac.29.06 cents in Sy.Nos.1-2, 3B, 3C, 3D, 14-1, 14-2, 19, 19-2, 19-3, 19-4, 20-2B, 20-3, 23-1, 25-2, 26-13, 26-14, 29-1, 29-3, 31-8, 34-17, 34-3, 34-7, 36-2, 37-1, 37-10, 37- 2, 37-6, 37-9, 40-3, 41-1, 41-2, 4-2, 42-1, 43, 44-1, 46-2, 49-3, 51-1, 53-1, 55, 56-1, 56-2, 58-3, 60-1, 6-1, 6-2, 62-8, 63-4, 63-5, 67-1, 67-2, 67-3, 69-1, 70-2, 71-10, 71-11, 71-16, 71-18, 71-5, 71-7, 71-9, 72-5, 72-7, 75-3, 76-15, 76-2, 76-8, 77-11, 77-12, 77-15, 77-3, 77-8, 80-10 of Rajannapeta Village, Rolugunta Mandal, Anakapalli District. The 1st petitioner’s mother died on
SRS,J W.P.No.19180 of 2025
31.12.2022. The 1st petitioner’s husband owns Ac.3.02 cents in Sy.Nos.22-1, 25-3, 62-1 & 63-1 of Rajannapeta Village. The 1st petitioner’s husband died on
29.02.2008. The 1st petitioner is in possession and enjoyment of the property. The 1st petitioner owns Ac.1.04 cents in Sy.No.51-2 of Rajannapeta Village. The 2nd petitioner owns Ac.0.03 cents and 4th petitioner owns ac.2.35 cents in Sy.Nos.45-4, 49-1 of Rajannapeta Village. He would also submit that respondent No.4, without issuing any notice, is interfering with the petitioners’ possession of the property.
3. Sri B.V. Satyanarayana, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, on instructions, would submit that re-survey work has been undertaken in the village and the farmers have been informed to attend the re- survey work to show their property boundaries along with documents and records. One Sri Peela Ramunaidu, one of the claimants attended the re- survey. However, failed to identify and show the boundaries of the aforementioned lands. Respondent No.4 is not interfering with the aforementioned property. The same is recorded.
4. Given the facts and circumstances of the case, the Writ Petition is
disposed of at the stage of admission with the consent of both the learned counsel, directing respondent No.4 not to interfere with the aforementioned property, without following due process of law. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date : 30.07.2025 TVN
SRS,J W.P.No.19180 of 2025
162 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI
WRIT PETITION No.19180 OF 2025
Date : 30.07.2025 TVN