- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21567 CRL.P No. 5937 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 5937 OF 2023 (482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS)) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. SHAKUNTALA W/O LATE SRI SHIVALINGAPPA AGED 64 YEARS OCC HOUSEWIFE R/O SOMASHETTIHALLI VILLAGE LINGADAHALLI, CHANNAGIRI TALUK DAVANAGERE DISTRICT-577221 2. SMT PALLAVI C S W/O SRI K S SIDDARAMESH AGED 39 YEARS OCC HOUSEWIFE 3. SRI K S SIDDARAMESH S/O SRI D SHANKRAPPA AGED 43 YEARS OCC REVENUE INSPECTOR BOTH PETITIONER NOS.2 & 3 ARE R/O NO.93, KONDADAHALLI VILLAGE CHANNAGIRI TALUK DAVANGERE DISTRICT-577552 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SIDDANOORU VISHWANATHA, ADVOCATE-ABSENT) Digitally signed by REKHA R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21567 CRL.P No. 5937 of 2023 AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY CHANNAGIRI POLICE STATION CHANNAGIRI DAVANAGERE-577213 REP BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BENGALURU-560001 2. SMT MAMATHA W/O SRI NIRANJANAMURTHY @ NAVEENA AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS OCC HOUSEWIFE R/O SOMASHETTIHALLI VILLAGE CHANNAGIRI TALUK DAVANGERE-577221 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.M.R.PATIL, HCGP FOR R1) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 CR.PC BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING TO QUASH THE FIR DATED 27.05.2023 REGISTERED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 CHANNAGIRI POLICE IN FIR OR CR.NO.198/2023 AS PER ANNEXURE-A AGAINST THE PETITIONERS FOR THE ALLEGED OFFENCE U/S 498A, 323, 324, 354, 504, 506 R/W SEC. 34 OF IPC, 1860 AND SEC. 3 AND 4 OF THE D.P. ACT, 1961, AND CONSEQUENTLY QUASH ALL THE SUBSEQUENT PROCEEDINGS THEREIN AND SUCH OTHER ORDER OR ORDERS AS THIS HONBLE COURT DEEMS FIT TO GRANT IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MS JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21567 CRL.P No. 5937 of 2023 ORAL ORDER No representation for petitioner. No representation for petitioner even in the afternoon session. On 11.06.2025, a conditional order was passed to the effect that if needful is not done, necessary orders would be passed for dismissal of petition. Despite the same, office objections are not complied with. It appears petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, petition is dismissed for default. Sd/- (J.M.KHAZI) JUDGE RR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 12