Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 26375 (RAJ)

TANU SANYEE D/O SHRI NAND KISHORE SANYEE v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMP/6299/2021 · 2025-09-19

Ashutosh Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:38587] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 6299/2021 Tanu Sanyee D/o Shri Nand Kishore Sanyee, Aged About 23 Years, Village Dujod, Tehsil Dhod, District Sikar ( Rajasthan) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. 2. Superintendent of Police, Sikar 3. SHO, Police Station Sadar, Sikar. ----- Respondents 4. Narendra @ Sharwansanyee S/o Shri Nand Kishore Sanyee, Village Dujod, Tehsil Dhod, District Sikar ( Rajasthan) 5. Praveen S/o Shri Nand Kishore Sanyee, Village Dujod, Tehsil Dhod, District Sikar ( Rajasthan) 6. Manish S/o Shri Nand Kishore Sanyee, Village Dujod, Tehsil Dhod, District Sikar, (Rajasthan) 7. Bhanwar Lal S/o Ramdev, Village Dujod, Tehsil Dhod, District Sikar ( Rajasthan) 8. Rajendra S/o Bhanwar Lal, Village Dujod, Tehsil Dhod, District Sikar ( Rajasthan) 9. Nemi Chand S/o Shri Ramdev, Village Dujod, Tehsil Dhod, District Sikar ( Rajasthan) 10. Madan Lal S/o Shri Ramdev, Village Dujod, Tehsil Dhod, District Sikar ( Rajasthan) ----Respondents-Accused For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Raghu Nandan Sharma, Adv. Mr. Abhinav Srivastava, Adv. Ms. Kritika Rajawat, Adv. Mr. Ayush Bishnoi, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, Addl.G.A HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR Order 19/09/2025 1. This criminal miscellaneous petition has been filed by petitioner seeking protection from the private respondent Nos. 4 [2025:RJ-JP:38587] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-6299/2021] to 10 as they are apprehending danger to the life and liberty of the petitioner. 2. As the matter is with regard to life and liberty of the petitioner, therefore, the petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No. 2 and 3 that no harm should be caused to the life and liberty of the petitioner from respondent Nos. 4 to 10 or other family members of the petitioner. 3. It is made clear that in case of any harm caused to the petitioner, the petitioner shall be at liberty to file an application in this regard to respondent No. 2 and 3. 4. With the above direction, the petition is disposed of. 5. Pending application(s) also stand disposed of. (ASHUTOSH KUMAR),J TANISHA /44