Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 26375 (CHH)

SHAMU @ SHAMBHU SONA v. RAVI THAKUR

MAC/1233/2018 · 2025-09-17

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:48013 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MAC No. 1233 of 2018 1 - Shamu @ Shambhu Sona S/o S/o Late Manohar Sona Aged About 50 Years R/o Purana Bhattipara, Post Office Kirandul, Tahsil Bacheli, District Dantewada, Chhattisgarh. .........Claimant., District : Dantewada, Chhattisgarh 2 - Smt. Ullapa Sona W/o W/o Shamu @ Shambhu Sona Aged About 49 Years R/o Purana Bhattipara, Post Office Kirandul, Tahsil Bacheli, District Dantewada, Chhattisgarh., District : Dantewada, Chhattisgarh ... Appellants versus 1 - Ravi Thakur S/o S/o Moti Thakur Aged About 21 Years R/o House No. 282 Ward, No. 08 Main Market Kirandul Post Office Kirandul Tahsil Bacheli, District Dantewada, Chhattisgarh. ..........Non Applicants., District : Dantewada, Chhattisgarh 2 - Dharmendra Kumar Sharma S/o S/o Moti Lal Sharma Aged About 30 Years R/o Main Market Kirandul Post Office Kirandul Tahsil Bacheli, District Dantewada, Chhattisgarh., District : Dantewada, Chhattisgarh 3 - The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., Through The Branch Manager Oriental Insurance, Co. Ltd., Hotel Laxman Avenue Near Sahid Park VISHAKHA BEOHAR Digitally signed by VISHAKHA BEOHAR 2 Jagdalpur District Bastar, Chhattisgarh. ........Insurer Of The Offending Vehicle., District : Bastar(Jagdalpur), Chhattisgarh ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from the Case Information System) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Appellant :- None For Respondents:- Mr. Hanuman Prasad Agrawal, Advocate ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SB- Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order On Board 18.09.2025 1. Heard. 2. Since there is no representation on behalf of the appellant even when the matter is called out in second round, this Court is left with no other option except to dismiss this petition for want of prosecution. 3. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Vishakha