Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 26363 (CHH)

SUNIL SHARMA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/3575/2021 · 2025-06-22

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:26797 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3575 of 2021 1 - Sunil Sharma S/o Shri Gajanand Sharma Aged About 41 Years R/o Village Rajkamma, Tehsil Katghora, District : Korba, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector, District : Korba, Chhattisgarh 2 - District Election Officer, District : Korba, Chhattisgarh 3 - Ashok Kumar Dewangan R/o Village Nunera, Tehsil Pali, District : Korba, Chhattisgarh 4 - Ishwar Singh Armekashan R/o Village Murli, Tehsil Pali, District : Korba, Chhattisgarh 5 - Madan Bhaiya R/o Village Hardibazar, Tehsil Pali, District : Korba, Chhattisgarh 6 - Mira Ramsharan Kawar R/o Village Hardibazar, Tehsil Pali, District : Korba, Chhattisgarh 7 - Prem Chnadra Patel R/o Village Rail Dabri, Tehsil Pali, District : Korba, Chhattisgarh 8 - Vedlal Dhanwar R/o Village Chautma, Tehsil Pali, District : Korba, Chhattisgarh 9 - Dr. Vijay Rathore R/o Village Hardibazar, Tehsil Pali, District : Korba, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Rohan Sharma, Advocate holding the brief of Mr. Shailendra Dubey, Advocate For State : Mr. Pramod Shrivastava, Deputy Government Advocate Digitally signed by RAMESH KUMAR VATTI 2 Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 23/06/2025 1. At the very outset, Mr. Rohan Sharma, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that by efflux of time, the present petition has become infructuous, therefore, this petition may be dismissed being rendered infructuous. 2. No objection from other side. 3. Recording the statement made by Mr. Rohan Sharma, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the petition is dismissed being rendered infructuous. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge vatti