Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 26362 (AP)

KARNI SRI LAKSHMI v. PADIGALA AYYAPPA

MACMA/1158/2019 · 2025-06-26

V Sujatha

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010372262019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSANDAND TWENTYFIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA MOTOR ACCIDENT CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No.1158 of 2019 Appeal filed under Section 173 of M.V.Act, aggrieved by the Judgment and Decree dated 13.09.2019 passed in M.V.O.P.No.137 of 2017 on the file of Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal - cum - XVI Additional District and sessions Judge’s Court, Nandigama, Krishna District. Between: 1. Kami Sri Lakshmi, W/o Venkaiah, House wife, aged about 20 years, D.No.10-26/1, Model Colony, Kanchikacherla Village and Mandal, Krishna District. 2. Kam Koteswaramma, W/o Anjaneyulu, Occ: Coolie, aged about 45 years, D.No. 10-26/1, Mandal, Krishna District. Model Colony, Kanchikacherla Village and ...Appellants/Petitioners AND 1. Padigala Ayyappa, S/o Durga Rao, aged about 30 years. Gottumukula Road, DVR Model Colony, Kanchikacherla Village and Mandal, Krsihna District. 2. Karri Anjaneyulu, S/o Venkaiah, aged about 50 years, Owner of the Vehicle AP-16-CR-0136, D.No.10-26/1, Model Colony, Kanchikacherla Village and Mandal, Krishna District. 3. Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Limited, Rep. by its Branch Manager, Branch Office, D.No.40-1-10, Upstairs Kusalava Hyundai Show Room, 2"^^ Floor, M.G. Road, Labbipet, Hyderabad. ...Respondents/Respondents : Sri S Sri Sita Rama Chandra Counsel for the Petitioners (Not Present) Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 & 2: None Appeared Counsel for Respondent No.3 The Court made the following order; : Sri P B Narasimha Murty APHC010372262019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) HEB [3333] FRIDAY ,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA MOTOR ACCIDENT CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 1158/2019 Between: Kami Sri Lakshmi and Others ...APPELLANT(S) AND Padigala Ayyappa and Others Counsel for the Appellant(S): 1.S SRI SITA RAMACHANDRA ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.P B NARASIMHA MURTY 2. The Court made the following: HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V. SUJATHA M.A.C.M.A.No.1158 of 2019 / JUDGMENT: On 11.11.2019, the appeal was admitted. Thereafter, the appeal went on several adjournments till 28.11.2024. On 28.11.2024, when the matter was taken up for hearing, there was no representation for the appellant and the matter was directed to be listed on 06.12.2024 under the caption “for dismissal”. Thereafter, even though the appeal came up for hearing on 24.01.2025, 24.02.2025. 05.05.2025. 09.05.2025, 17.06.2025 and 20.06.2025, there was no representation for the appellant and hence, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption for dismissal” on 27.06.2025. Today also, even though the matter is listed under the caption representation for the appellant. It indicates that the appellant is not diligent in pursuing the matter. Hence, this court is left with other option except to dismiss the appeal for default. Accordingly, the M.A.C.M.A. is dismissed for default. No tor dismissal”, there is no no costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if pending shall stand closed. any Sd/-B PRASADA RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTIoj OFFICER To 1. The Chairman, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal - cum - XVI Additional District and sessions Judge’s Court, Nandigama, Krishna District, (with records if any) 2. One CC to Sri S Sri Sita Ramachandra, Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to Sri P B Narasimha Murty, Advocate [OPUC] 4. The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh Amaravathi. (to dispatch the trial court records) 5. Two CD Copies at TK sree HIGH COURT DATED;27/06/2025 JUDGMENT MAGMA No.1158 of 2019 DISMISSING THE MAGMA FOR DEFAULT WITHOUT COSTS