Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 26358 (JHR)

DR SHILPI KUMARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

WPC/5188/2018 · 2025-03-06

Sri Ananda Sen

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No.5188 of 2018 ------ 1. Dr. Shilpi Kumari, daughter of Sri Shankar Prasad Nayak, resident of Qr. No.3, P-Block, RINPAS Quarter, P.O. & P.S. Kanke, District Ranchi. 2. Dr. Ram Sakal Hansdah, son of Uday Hansdah, resident of Qr. No.G-1, RINPAS Quarter, P.O. & P.S. Kanke, District Ranchi. 3. Dr. Ram Pravesh Singh, son of Sri Krishna Nandan Prasad, resident of Qr. No.206, RINPAS Quarter, P.O. & P.S. Kanke, District Ranchi. 4. Dr. J.C. Niranjan, son of Chittaranjan Mehra, resident of Qtr. No.Q-2, RINPAS Quarter, P.O. & P.S. Kanke, District Ranchi. 5. Dr. Ramesh Kumar Hembram, son of Dinu Hembram, resident of Qtr. No.4, P Block, RINPAS Quarter, P.O. & P.S. Kanke, District Ranchi. … … Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. The Secretary, Health, Medical Education and Family Welfare Department, Government of Jharkhand, having its office at Nepal House, Doranda, Ranchi. 3. Director, Health, Medical Education and Family Welfare Department, Government of Jharkhand, having its office at Nepal House, Doranda, Ranchi. 4. Director, RINPAS, RINPAS Campus, Kanke, Ranchi. … … Respondents ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Saurav Arun, Advocate Ms. Ayushi, Advocate For the Respondent(s): Mr. Soumya S. Pandey, AC to AAG-I Dr. Ashok Kr. Singh, Advocate ------ 17/ 06.03.2025 Heard learned counsel representing the petitioners and learned counsel representing the respondents. 2. Mr. Saurav Arun, learned counsel representing the petitioners submits that the respondents be directed to pay the salary / stipend for the Junior Residents, as per the State Government Rule. He submits that the said decision has been taken vide Agenda-62.08 of the 62nd Management Committee Meeting of 2 RINPAS, Kanke, Ranchi, held on 26.11.2018. He refers to Annexure- A to the Counter Affidavit, which was filed on 23.04.2019. He further submits that the respondents should make the aforesaid payment for the period from which the amount of stipend has not been paid. 3. Dr. Ashok Kr. Singh, learned counsel representing the RINPAS, submits that vide Agenda-62.08 of the 62nd Management Committee Meeting held on 26.11.2018, a decision was taken to give salary / stipend to the Junior Residents, as the per the State Government Rule. 4. Admittedly, the petitioners worked as Junior Residents. Their salary / stipend was not paid, as there was a dispute about the rate. 5. Ultimately, the Management Committee in its Meeting dated 26.11.2018, had resolved and decided to pay salary / stipend to the Junior Residents as per the State Government Rule. 6. Since the respondent – RINPAS had already taken a decision to pay the salary / stipend as per the State Government’s Rule, I direct the respondents to pay the arrears of salary / stipend amount at the rates and as per the Rule of the State Government. The said payment should be made to each of the individual petitioner within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 7. In view of the aforesaid direction, the instant writ petition stands disposed of. (ANANDA SEN, J.) Prashant.Cp-2