- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:18214 WP No. 13812 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF MAY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M G UMA WRIT PETITION NO. 13812 OF 2025 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. KUMARI BIBI YAMINA D/O MUHAMMAD FAROOQ AGED ABOUT 8 YEARS 2. MASTER MUHAMMAD MUDASSIR S/O MUHAMMAD FAROOQ AGED ABOUT 4 YEARS 3. MASTER MUHAMMAD YOUSAF S/O MUHAMMAD FAROOQ AGED ABOUT 3 YEARS ALL ARE PERMANENT RESIDENT OF FLAT QANDHARI BAZAR ZUETTA, BALUCHISTAN, PAKISTAN. CURRENTLY RESIDING AT NO.927 15TH CROSS, 2ND STAGE RAJIV NAGARA, MYSORE - 570 019. SINCE PETITIONERS ARE MINORS THEY ARE REPRESENTED BY THEIR MOTHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN SMT. RAMSHA JAHAN W/O MUHAMMAD FAROOQ. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. K.S. GANESHA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS SOUTH BLOCK PARLIAMENT Digitally signed by NANDINI B G Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:18214 WP No. 13812 of 2025 NEW - DELHI - 100 001. REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA VIDHANA SOUDHA AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU - 560 001. REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 3. COMMISSIONER OF POLICE AND FOREIGNERS REGISTRATION OFFICER MYSORE CITY POLICE, MIRZA ROAD NAZARBAD, MYSORE CITY - 570 010. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. H. SHASTHI BHUSHAN, DSGI FOR R1 SRI. DEVARAJ C.H., GOVT. ADVOCATE FOR R2 AND R3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTING THE R3 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION OF THE PETITIONERS DATED 29/04/2025 VIDE ANNEXURE-O AND ETC., THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING - B GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M G UMA ORAL ORDER Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Deputy Solicitor General of India for the respondents. 2. Petitioners are seeking issuance of writ in the nature of mandamus to direct respondent No.3 to consider their representation dated 29.04.2025 produced at Annexure-O and - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:18214 WP No. 13812 of 2025 to restrain the respondents from taking coercive steps against the petitioners till 15.05.2025. 3. The petitioners have also sought for interim order directing respondent No.3 to extend the visa period by considering Annexure-O and till then allowing the petitioners to stay in India. 4. Learned Deputy Solicitor General of India has drawn the attention of the Court to the fact that the petitioners are minor children who have born to Indian mother through Pakistani national. The father of the petitioners had visited India once during 2016. The petitioners have arrived in India on 04.01.2025 along with their Indian mother for six months on visitor visa (stay stipulation 45 days). 5. It is a matter of fact that in view of the deadly terror attack at Pahalgam on 22.04.2025, the Union of India through the Cabinet Committee on Security (CCS) has taken a policy decision to suspend various visas including visitor visa and directed the Pakistani nationals to leave the country on or before 27.04.2025. The Under Secretary to Government of India passed the order dated 25.04.2025 regarding revocation - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC:18214 WP No. 13812 of 2025 of visa to Pakistani nationals. The Union of India through CCS has taken conscious decision to safeguard the interest of its citizens. Under such circumstances, I do not find any reason to interfere with the same to pass any order in favour of the petitioners. Hence, the petition is dismissed. Sd/- (M G UMA) JUDGE *bgn/- CT:VS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 115