APHC010372822025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 18919/2025 Between: 1. BANDARU JALADURGA, D/O.VISWESAWARAO AGED ABOUT.40 YEARS, OCC.HOUSE WIFE. R/O.7-33-151, SUNNIPENTA VILLAGE, SRISAILAM MANDAL, NANDYALA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI,AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NANDYAL DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, SUNNIPENTA POLICE STATION, SRISAILAM MANDAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 5. SHAIK SAYED BASHA SHAIK SAISA, S/O.MABU, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, OCC.BUSINESS, R/O.D.NO.5-27-1, VIJAK CAMP, SUNNIPENTA VILLAGE, SRISAILAM MANDAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. 6. SHAIK MABU, FATHER OF SAYED BASHA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCC.BUSINESS, R/O. .D.NO.5-27-1, VIJAK CAMP, SUNNIPENTA VILLAGE SRISAILAM MANDAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. 7. SHAIK RAMJABEE, W/O.SHAIK MABU, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, OCC.HOUSE WIFE. R/O.D.NO.5-27-1, VIJAK CAMP, SUNNIPENTA VILLAGE, SRISAILAM MANDAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. 8. SHAIK MAABEE, D/O.SAHIK MASUM, AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS, OCC.BUSINESS, R/O.5-24-1, VIJAK CAMP, SUNNIPENTA VILLAGE, SRISAILAM MANDAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. 9. SHAIK MANSUM, BROTHER OF THE SAYED BASHA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC.BUNINESS, R/O.D.NO.5-27-1, VIJAK CAMP, SUNNIPENTA VILLAGE, SRISAILAM MANDAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. 10. SHAIK NAJEER, RELATIVE OF SAYED BASHA, AGED ABOUT, 49 YEARS, OCC. MUSIC ARTIST, R/O.OPPOSITE BUSSTAND, SUNNIPENTA VILLAGE, SRISAILAM MANDAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of mandamus. Aggrieved by the inaction on the part of Respondent No. 3 and 4 who are not taking any action against my representation dated 10-07-2025, against the unofficial respondents arbitrary illegal, contrary to the settled legal position, apart from being violative of fundamental rights guaranteed to me under Articles, 14, 19 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents 3 to 4 to dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 10.07.2025 by complying with the directions of Apex Court in the case of LALITA KUMARI Vs GOVT. OF U.P. AND ORS(2013)14SCR713 and protect the life and liberty of the Petitioners and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the Respondents 3 to 4 to consider the petitioner representation dated 10.07.2025, pending disposal of writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. BURLA SIVA RAMA KRISHNA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer: “….to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of mandamus. Aggrieved by the inaction on the part of Respondent No. 3 and 4 who are not taking any action against my representation dated 10-07-2025, against the unofficial respondents arbitrary illegal, contrary to the settled legal position, apart from being violative of fundamental rights guaranteed to me under Articles, 14, 19 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents 3 to 4 to dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 10.07.2025 by complying with the directions of Apex Court in the case of LALITA KUMARI Vs GOVT. OF U.P. AND ORS(2013)14SCR713 and protect the life and liberty of the Petitioners and pass.…” 2. Heard Sri B.Siva Rama Krishna, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.Farook, Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the police are not taking any action against the representation dated 10.07.2025 made by the petitioner. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader on written instructions would submit that the petitioner has filed a complaint after many days of the alleged incident and the petitioner has not come to the police station for preliminary enquiry. 4. Recording the same, this Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the petitioner is at liberty to recourse her remedy according to law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATAJYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 25.07.2025 MH THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 105 WRIT PETITION NO: 18919/2025 Dt.25.07.2025 MH