Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 26354 (AP)

Mudili Rama Krishna v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

CRLP/6025/2020 · 2025-07-16

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010372332020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 6025/2020 Between: 1. MUDILI RAMA KRISHNA,, S/O SRINIVASA RAO, OCC BUSINESS, R/O 1- 56-11/1, FLAT NO. 1, MIG-I, SECTOR-1, MVP COLONY, VISAKHAPATNAM ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF A.P., HYDERABAD. 2. VENKATA SURYA PRAKASH RAO KANNURI, S/0 RANGA SWAMY, AGE 43 YRS, RIO DOOR NO. 10-9, RAVI NAGAR, NAIDU THOTA, VEPAGUNTA, VISAKHAPATNAM ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court pleased to quash the FIR vide No. 437 of 2015, dated 02.11.2015 and Charge Sheet vide DDR No. 7504, dated 14.12.2017 filed against the Petitioner, in view of the Hon'ble Apex Court Judgment, dated 31.01.2020 passed in Crl. A No. 125 of 2020 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings including the appearance of the petitioner in CC No. 134 of 2018 on the file of III Metropolitan Magistrate, Visakhapatnam, in the interest of justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: 1. DR D V RAO Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 6025/2020 ORDER: The instant criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short ‘Cr.P.C) has been filed by the Petitioners/Accused No.3, seeking quashment of the proceedings pending against him in FIR No. 437 of 2015, dated 02.11.2015 and charge sheet vide DDR No.7504, dated 14.12.2017, in view of the Hon’ble Apex Court Judgment dated 31.01.2020 passed in Crl.A.No.125 of 2020. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Dr. D.V. RAO, learned counsel for the petitioner/Accused would submit that the matter may be disposed of since the relief has become infructuous. 3. Ms. K. Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for the State is in attendance. 5. Recording the above said submission, the Criminal Petition is dismissed, since the relief has become infructuous. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 17.07.2025 UPS HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 6025/2020 Dated.17.07.2025 UPS 15