APHC010373922025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No. 19106/2025 Between: SHAIK VAHIDA, W/O.SHAIK MAHABOOB BASHA, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE WIFE R/O.H.NO.LT-LLLA, PARK ROAD, NANDYAL TOWN, NANDYAL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NANDYAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. 3. THE ADDITIONAL SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NANDYAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. 4. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NANDYAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, I-TOWN POLICE STATION, NANDYAL,NSINDYAL DISTRICT. 6. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, GOSPADU POLICE STATION, GOSPADU, NANDYAL DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P NAGENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus, to declare the action of the Respondents in obtaining the PT Warrant in new FIRs registered during remand of the Petitioner even in spite of the punishment prescribed for the offences mentioned in the FIR is less that 7 years 2 as arbitrary, illegal and contrary to guidelines of the Honhle Apex Court in Arnesh Kumar Vs.State of Bihar and violation of Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents Police to follow the procedure prescribed U/sec.35(3) of the BNSS while obtaining the PT Warrant against the Petitioner in the new FIRs in terms of guidelines of the Hon'ble Apex Court in Arnesh Kumar Vs.State of Bihar in the interest of justice.” 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri P.Nagendra Reddy, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that no further orders are required in this matter as the relief sought in this petition has become infructuous. 3. Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, would submit that Court may pass appropriate orders. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is dismissed as the relief has become infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:04.08.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.19106 of 2025 Dt.04.08.2025 Dinesh