APHC010372462013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] WEDNESDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 13917/2013 Between: 1. NIRVASITULA MATYASAKARULA SEVA SANGHAM, VSP DIST & 2 OTHERS, REGD. NO. 570/2011. REP. BY ITS PRESIDENT PERLA VENKATA SWAMY,S/O. CHLNNA SATHALAH, AGED 33 YEARS, R/O, 15-1-20/1, 50TH WARD, GANGAVARAM (V), PEDAGANTYADA MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT - 530044, A.P. 2. PERLA AMMORU, S/O. SINGAYYA (LATE), OCC: UNEMPLOYEE, AGED 37 YEARS, STEEL PLANT DISPLACE PERSON R CARD 94, R/O. 17-61-14, GANGAVARAM (V), PEDAGANTYADA MANDAL,VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 3. PERLA JAGANADHAM, S/O. DANAYYA (LATE), AGED 30 YEARS, STEEL PLANT DISPLACE PERSON R CARD 92, R/O. 17-61-16, GANGAVARAM (V), PEDAGANTYADA MANDAL,VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. RASHTRIYA ISPAT NIGAM LTD VSP DIST 5 OTHERS, VISAKHAPATNAM STEEL PLANT, REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN-CUM- MANAGING DIRECTOR VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 2. THE DIRECTOR PERSONNEL, VISAKHAPATNAM STEEL PLANT, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. Page 2 of 4 SRS,J W.P.No.13917 of 2013 4. THE SPECIAL GRADE DEPUTY COLLECTOR, STEEL PLANT LAND ACQUISITION, COLLECTOR OFFICE COMPOUND, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DIST. 5. THE JR EMPLOYMENT OFFICER, SUB EMPLOYMENT EXCHANGE, STEEL PLANT GOVERNMENT NEW ITT, VIKASNAGAR, GAJUWAKA, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DIST. 6. STATE OF AP, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, HYDERABAD. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents particularly respondents 1 and 2 in allowing the private persons to encroach. and occupy the land which belongs to Visakhapatnam Steel Plant which was acquired for the purpose of Construction of Steel plant and not taking preventive and coercive steps to re- acquire such land from the hands of encroachers as arbitrary, Illegal malaflde violating Article 14, 21 of Constitution of India similarly not providing employment or not allotting land to the petitioners and other similarly placed persons or compensation in lieu of R-card as equally arbitrary, malafide unconstitutional violating Article 14, 21 of Constitution of India and issue a consequential direction directing the respondents to forthwith constitute a committee consisting of various authorities including police and identify unauthorized occupied land of Steel plant by unauthorized persons and further direct the respondents to take back land from the unauthorized persons occupied Illegally and allot the same to the petitioners as well as similarly placed persons and also direct the respondents to provide employment under Rehabilitation scheme or alternatively allot land of Ac.5.00 each to the petitioners and similarly placed persons or pay compensation of an amount of Rs.30.00 lakhs each candidate by disposing the representation dated 29-10- 2012,and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 17015 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to forthwith constitute a committee to identify the land which belongs to Steel Plant encroached by the private persons un SRS,J W.P.No.13917 of 2013 authorizedly and distribute the same to the petitioners and similarly displaced persons, pending disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. P V KRISHNAIAH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. K SARVA BHOUMA RAO 2. A S C BOSE The Court made the following order: Since there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners when the matter was listed 30.06.2025, the matter was directed to be listed on 02.07.2025 under the caption ‘for dismissal’. 2. The matter was listed on 02.07.2025 and at the request of learned counsel for the petitioners, it was directed to be listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal’. 3. Despite the writ petition being listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there is no representation for the petitioners either in the forenoon or in the afternoon. It seems the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the writ petition. 4. Hence, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 09.07.2025 IKN SRS,J W.P.No.13917 of 2013 369 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 13917 of 2013 Date: 09.07.2025 IKN