Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 26343 (RAJ)

RAM GOPAL VAISHNAV S/O SHRI BALADAS JI VAISHNAV v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/13708/2024 · 2025-05-06

Anoop Kumar Dhand

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:19076] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13708/2024 Ram Gopal Vaishnav S/o Shri Baladas Ji Vaishnav, Aged About 58 Years, Resident Of Ward No. 41, Dollar Walo Ka Mohalla, Jhalawar (Rajasthan). ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through District Collector, Jhalawar (Rajasthan). 2. Commissioner, Devasthan Vibhag, Udaipur, Rajasthan. 3. Assistant Commissioner, Devasthan Vibhag, (Kota). 4. Executive Officer, Nagar Palika, Jhalawar (Rajasthan). 5. Hari Mohan Suman S/o Shri Ram Dayal Suman, Aged About 70 Years, Resident Of Motor Garage Choraha, Bada Bazar, Jhalawar. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Vikas Ghosalya for Mr.Ajay Kumar Jain JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 06/05/2025 1. The instant writ petition has been preferred by the petitioner with the following prayer:- “The humble petitioners most humbly prays that your Lordship may very graciously be pleased to accept and allow this petition and by an appropriate writ or directions, Respondent No.1 to 4 may be directed to take over the government property i.e., the property of the government Mandir from Respondent No.5 immediately and proper action should be initiated against erring officials and other persons.” [2025:RJ-JP:19076] (2 of 2) [CW-13708/2024] 2. By way of filing this petition, the petitioner is seeking direction against the respondents for taking over the property of Mandir from respondent No.5 and taking action against the errying officials. 3. In the considered opinion of this Court, the relief sought for in this writ petition, cannot be granted by this Court in exercise of its powers contained under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by exercising its inherent jurisdiction, as the disputed questions of facts and law are involved. If the petitioner feels aggrieved, he can approach the competent Court of law for redressal of grievance. 4. Accordingly, the instant writ petition stands dismissed. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stand dismissed. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Aayush Sharma /12