PANKAJ BANSAL, S/O KALI CHARAN BANSAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/11678/2025 · 2025-09-01
Sameer Jain
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 26339 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 26339 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:34995] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11678/2025 Pankaj Bansal, S/o Kali Charan Bansal, Aged About 50 Years, R/o 3965, Dlf Phase-3, Gurgaon, Haryana-122001. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of Transport, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan).
2. District Transport Officer, Jhalana, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
3. Assistant Regional Transport Officer, Jagatpura, Jhalana, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Lovesh for Mr. Anshuman Saxena For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 01/09/2025 Vide order dated 04.08.2025, Registrar (Judicial) was asked to elucidate as to why matters pertaining to the taxation are listed before the Single Bench. In compliance of the same, an explanation is furnished before the Court, which is reproduced as under:-
“1.
यह है कक पतावली मे सवरपथम Subject Matter
को देखा गया एवं
उक पतावली के Subject Matter मे Tax Act
एवं संबंकधत पावधानों
का उलेख नहीं ककया गया है ।
2.
यह है कक इसके पशात Prayer Clause
मे भी Tax
संबंधी Remedy
नहीं चाही गई है।
3.
यह है कक उक पतावली मे Tax Department Party
भी नहीं है।
4.
यह है कक पतावली के फु टनोट मे भी कवदान अकधवका ने उक
याकचका के डीबी कसकवल ररट होने के समन मे कोई भी घोषणा अंककत
नहीं की थी।”
[2025:RJ-JP:34995] (2 of 2) [CW-11678/2025] Upon a perusal of the said explanation it is prima facie noted that the Registrar (Judicial) as well as the explaining authority concerned have failed to analyse the Annexure-1 i.e. typed copy wherein as per para 6 at page 16, the demand is raised qua the Rajasthan Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1951. Same is also reflected at para 16A, praying quashing of Annexure-1. This Court directs the Registrar (Judicial) as well as explaining authority to remain more cautious and vigilant, specially when a query is posted by the Court. Present petition is dismissed for statistical purpose. Howsoever, petitioner is at liberty to file appropriate notices/appropriate correction or he can file fresh petition, if so chooses.
(SAMEER JAIN),J Pooja /49