Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 26327 (BOM)

PRALHAD MAHADEV GADE v. MUKUND SAKHARAM KHETRE AND ANR

CA/10686/2024 · 2025-01-02

Shri S G Chapalgaonkar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Tauseef 24-CA.10686.2024.odt IN IN THE THE HIGH HIGH COURT COURT OF OF JUDICATURE JUDICATURE AT AT BOMBAY BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.10686 OF 2024 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.10686 OF 2024 IN IN FIRST APPEAL (STAMP) NO.23178 OF 2024 FIRST APPEAL (STAMP) NO.23178 OF 2024 Pralhad Mahadev Gade Pralhad Mahadev Gade ...Applicant ...Applicant Versus Versus Mukund Sakharam Khetre & Anr. Mukund Sakharam Khetre & Anr. …Respondents …Respondents _____________________________________________________ Adv. Ankita J. Mantri h/f. Adv. Swapnil SunilKumar Dargad for Applicant. _____________________________________________________ CORAM : S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR DATE : 2nd JANUARY 2025 P.C.:- 1. Heard Mrs. Mantri, learned Advocate appearing for Applicant. 2. Applicant seeks to condone the delay of 332 days caused in filing the appeal against judgment and award dated 21st June 2023 in MACP No.87 of 2020. Inspite of service of notice, none appears for Respondents. After going through the reasons as stated in paragraphs 4 to 6, sufficient cause to condone the delay is discernible. 3. In that view of the matter, application is allowed. The delay of 332 days caused in filing the appeal is condoned. Appeal be registered, subject to removal of office objections. 1 of 2 Tauseef 24-CA.10686.2024.odt 4. On registration of appeal, issue notice to Respondents, returnable on 13th February 2025. (S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.) 2 of 2