PRALHAD MAHADEV GADE v. MUKUND SAKHARAM KHETRE AND ANR
CA/10686/2024 · 2025-01-02
Shri S G Chapalgaonkar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 26327 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 26327 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Tauseef
24-CA.10686.2024.odt IN IN THE THE HIGH HIGH COURT COURT OF OF JUDICATURE JUDICATURE AT AT BOMBAY BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.10686 OF 2024 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.10686 OF 2024 IN IN FIRST APPEAL (STAMP) NO.23178 OF 2024 FIRST APPEAL (STAMP) NO.23178 OF 2024
Pralhad Mahadev Gade Pralhad Mahadev Gade ...Applicant ...Applicant Versus Versus Mukund Sakharam Khetre & Anr. Mukund Sakharam Khetre & Anr. …Respondents …Respondents _____________________________________________________ Adv. Ankita J. Mantri h/f. Adv. Swapnil SunilKumar Dargad for Applicant. _____________________________________________________
CORAM : S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR
DATE : 2nd JANUARY 2025 P.C.:-
1. Heard Mrs. Mantri, learned Advocate appearing for Applicant.
2. Applicant seeks to condone the delay of 332 days caused in filing the appeal against judgment and award dated 21st June 2023 in MACP No.87 of 2020. Inspite of service of notice, none appears for Respondents. After going through the reasons as stated in paragraphs 4 to 6, sufficient cause to condone the delay is discernible.
3. In that view of the matter, application is allowed. The delay of 332 days caused in filing the appeal is condoned. Appeal be registered, subject to removal of office objections. 1 of 2
Tauseef
24-CA.10686.2024.odt
4. On registration of appeal, issue notice to Respondents, returnable on 13th February 2025.
(S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.) 2 of 2