IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA (121+264) M/s P.K.Verma & Company The Chief Engineer, BFLZ, CPWD, New Delhi & another CORAM : Present:- LAPITA BANERJI CM-5121-5122 alongwith annexures on behalf of the respondents and for exemption from filing certified copy of the Replies alongwith annexures are taken on record, subject to just exceptions. ARB-104-2025 1. Arbitrator under Sec (for short, the ‘1996 Act’). 2. arbitration proceedings are nearing conclusion. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent a IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH M/s P.K.Verma & Company Versus The Chief Engineer, BFLZ, CPWD, New Delhi & another CORAM : HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Mr.J.S.Saini, Advocate, for Mr.Dheeraj Mahajan, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.B.S.Kanwar, Advocate (through VC), for respondent/UOI. ***** LAPITA BANERJI, J. (Oral) 5122-CII-2025 These are applications for placing on record short replies alongwith annexures on behalf of the respondents and for exemption from filing certified copy of the annexures. Accordingly, applications CM alongwith annexures are taken on record, subject to just exceptions. 2025 This is a petition for extension of the mandate of the learned Sole Arbitrator under Section 29(A)(3) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short, the ‘1996 Act’). Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the arbitration proceedings are nearing conclusion. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent admits that infact the proceedings are nearing conclusion. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ARB-104-2025 (O&M) Decided on : 18.03.2025 ……Petitioner Versus The Chief Engineer, BFLZ, CPWD, New Delhi & another ……Respondents LAPITA BANERJI Mr.Dheeraj Mahajan, Advocate, for the petitioner. (through VC), for respondent/UOI. for placing on record short replies alongwith annexures on behalf of the respondents and for exemption from CM-5121-5122-CII-2025 are allowed. alongwith annexures are taken on record, subject to just exceptions. This is a petition for extension of the mandate of the learned Sole tion 29(A)(3) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the arbitration proceedings are nearing conclusion. Learned counsel appearing for at infact the proceedings are nearing conclusion. ……Petitioner ……Respondents (through VC), for respondent/UOI. for placing on record short replies alongwith annexures on behalf of the respondents and for exemption from are allowed. alongwith annexures are taken on record, subject to just exceptions. This is a petition for extension of the mandate of the learned Sole tion 29(A)(3) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the arbitration proceedings are nearing conclusion. Learned counsel appearing for SAILESH RANJAN 2025.03.21 16:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document (121+264) ARB-104-2025 (O&M) -2- 3. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the mandate of the learned Arbitrator is extended for a period of 6 months under Section 29-A of the 1996 Act. 4. Petition is disposed of. 5. Pending application(s), if any, are accordingly, disposed of. (LAPITA BANERJI) March 18, 2025 JUDGE sailesh Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No SAILESH RANJAN 2025.03.21 16:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document